mudlet-makers team mailing list archive

[xtian <853392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

in addition it would be nice if you would implement some rudimentary
text formatting tags. Otherwise servers (i.e. I) will have to implement
checks and workarounds for Mudlet, as all other MXP clients I know to
date, all parse the standard text formatting tags: <b>, <i>, <color> to
name a few.

So, while the standard provides a way to check if a client implements
some of these tags via the <SUPPORT> (which you dont implement as of
now, see other bug report), it also would be easier if you added them
either way, so that servers that didn't check for valid implementation
of these tags wont have to retro-fit.

** Affects: mudlet
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: mxp

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mudlet
Makers, which is subscribed to Mudlet.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/853392

Title:
  MXP: no <b> (bold) tag and other text formatting

Status in Mudlet the MUD client:
  New

Bug description:
  in addition it would be nice if you would implement some rudimentary
  text formatting tags. Otherwise servers (i.e. I) will have to
  implement checks and workarounds for Mudlet, as all other MXP clients
  I know to date, all parse the standard text formatting tags: <b>, <i>,
  <color> to name a few.

  So, while the standard provides a way to check if a client implements
  some of these tags via the <SUPPORT> (which you dont implement as of
  now, see other bug report), it also would be easier if you added them
  either way, so that servers that didn't check for valid implementation
  of these tags wont have to retro-fit.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mudlet/+bug/853392/+subscriptions