mythbuntu-bugs team mailing list archive
-
mythbuntu-bugs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03104
[Bug 655512] [NEW] No /dev/lirc0 entry for mceusb remote
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: lirc
Using kernel 2.6.35-20 works fine - there is /dev/lirc0 entry. Recent
upgrade to 2.6.35-22 caused /dev/lirc0 to disappear. Rebooting with
2.6.35-20 brings it back.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: lirc 0.8.7~pre3-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/lirc/extras/transmitter.hwdb]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-20-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Oct 5 23:36:42 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha i386 (20100910)
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_CA.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: lirc
** Affects: lirc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: apport-bug i386 maverick
--
No /dev/lirc0 entry for mceusb remote
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655512
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mythbuntu
Bug Team, which is subscribed to lirc in ubuntu.
Status in “lirc” package in Ubuntu: New
Bug description:
Binary package hint: lirc
Using kernel 2.6.35-20 works fine - there is /dev/lirc0 entry. Recent upgrade to 2.6.35-22 caused /dev/lirc0 to disappear. Rebooting with 2.6.35-20 brings it back.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: lirc 0.8.7~pre3-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/lirc/extras/transmitter.hwdb]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-20-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Oct 5 23:36:42 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Alpha i386 (20100910)
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_CA.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: lirc
Follow ups
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Steve Langasek, 2014-03-16
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-10-31
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Jarod Wilson, 2011-09-16
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Angus Kerr, 2011-09-13
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Julien Valgrès, 2011-01-29
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Brad Figg, 2010-12-04
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Kimmo Huoman, 2010-10-24
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Kimmo Huoman, 2010-10-23
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Jean-Baptiste Lallement, 2010-10-22
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: enb, 2010-10-15
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Matt Rice, 2010-10-14
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Matt Rice, 2010-10-14
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Todd Chisholm, 2010-10-08
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Todd Chisholm, 2010-10-08
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Todd Chisholm, 2010-10-08
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Todd Chisholm, 2010-10-08
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Todd Chisholm, 2010-10-08
-
[Bug 655512] Re: /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Mario Limonciello, 2010-10-08
-
[Bug 655512] [NEW] /dev/lirc0 disappeared after upgrade from 2.6.35-20 to -22
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-10-08
-
[Bug 655512] Re: No /dev/lirc0 entry for mceusb remote
From: MarcRandolph, 2010-10-07
-
[Bug 655512] Re: No /dev/lirc0 entry for mceusb remote
From: Todd Chisholm, 2010-10-06
-
[Bug 655512] [NEW] No /dev/lirc0 entry for mceusb remote
From: Todd Chisholm, 2010-10-06
References