nova-api team mailing list archive

[Brian Waldon <brian.waldon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm with Lorin here. The aim of a WADL is to provide a parseable description of a contract. 

Pedro: Make sure your tool is using the same WADL version (I think there's 2006 and 2009) as the spec itself. Maybe one of those doesn't allow assert tags? I have personally built the WADL on my own machine, so I know it is possible...

Waldon


On Dec 6, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Lorin Hochstein wrote:

> 
> 
> On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
>> My understanding is that this isn't supporrted; WADL is used in OpenStack for generating documentation and QA. Generating static bindings from a description like this leads to brittleness.
>> 
> 
> I thought  one of the aims of having the WADL was this specific use case: to support automatic generation of bindings for various (non-Python) languages. This came up during one of the sessions at the Essex design summit.
> 
> Lorin
> --
> Lorin Hochstein, Computer Scientist
> USC Information Sciences Institute
> 703.812.3710
> http://www.east.isi.edu/~lorin
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nova-api
> Post to     : nova-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nova-api
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp