nova-api team mailing list archive

[Pedro Navarro Pérez <pednape@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks ! I didn't know there are different versions. I'll try again
with the right version

Pedro

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Brian Waldon <brian.waldon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm with Lorin here. The aim of a WADL is to provide a parseable description of a contract.
>
> Pedro: Make sure your tool is using the same WADL version (I think there's 2006 and 2009) as the spec itself. Maybe one of those doesn't allow assert tags? I have personally built the WADL on my own machine, so I know it is possible...
>
> Waldon
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Lorin Hochstein wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 6, 2011, at 9:56 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> My understanding is that this isn't supporrted; WADL is used in OpenStack for generating documentation and QA. Generating static bindings from a description like this leads to brittleness.
>>>
>>
>> I thought  one of the aims of having the WADL was this specific use case: to support automatic generation of bindings for various (non-Python) languages. This came up during one of the sessions at the Essex design summit.
>>
>> Lorin
>> --
>> Lorin Hochstein, Computer Scientist
>> USC Information Sciences Institute
>> 703.812.3710
>> http://www.east.isi.edu/~lorin
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nova-api
>> Post to     : nova-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nova-api
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>