nunit-core team mailing list archive

[Rechenelf <629661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

We should avoid usinge the mechanism for parameterized test in theories.
The following example has "exploding" combinatorical parameters. To
avoid this, we must use ValueSource.

  [Datapoints]
  public double[] as = new double[] { 0.0, 1.0, -1.0, 42.0 };
  public double[] bs = new double[] { 0.0, 1.0, 100.0 };

  [Theory]
  public void Add(double num1, double num2)
  {
    Assert.That(num1 + num2 == num2 + num1);
  }


But it might be nicer if we really can avoid it using a new attribut Use:
  [Theory]
  public void Add([Use(as)] double num1, [Use(bs)] double num2)
  {
    Assert.That(num1 + num2 == num2 + num1);
  }

** Affects: nunitv2
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: attribute datapoint feauture theory use

-- 
Theory and Datapoints
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629661
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.

Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework: New

Bug description:
We should avoid usinge the mechanism for parameterized test in theories. The following example has "exploding" combinatorical parameters. To avoid this, we must use ValueSource.

  [Datapoints]
  public double[] as = new double[] { 0.0, 1.0, -1.0, 42.0 };
  public double[] bs = new double[] { 0.0, 1.0, 100.0 };

  [Theory]
  public void Add(double num1, double num2)
  {
    Assert.That(num1 + num2 == num2 + num1);
  }


But it might be nicer if we really can avoid it using a new attribut Use:
  [Theory]
  public void Add([Use(as)] double num1, [Use(bs)] double num2)
  {
    Assert.That(num1 + num2 == num2 + num1);
  }