nunit-core team mailing list archive

[Charlie Poole <charlie@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, it is possible, but string-based implementations usually don't do
it because there are cleaner approaches that get rid of the strings
entirely, making refactoring better. For example, see NSubstitute or
Moq. We use NSubstitute.

Unfortunately, it's a major effort to develop and maintain a mock
framework and also a major effort to develop and maintain a testing
framework. Since we are a testing framework, we'll let others
concentrate on the mocking.

Charlie

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894842

Title:
  DynamicMock error

Status in NUnit Test Framework:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  If we call 
  mock.ExpectNoCall("NotExistingFunction");
  no error is reported, even if the function not exists. 
  In my eyeys this is a bug.

  Other methods like Expect doesn't check the existence of the methode
  name, too. I think this is the first thing they must do and report an
  error like: method "NotExistingFunction" does not exist.

  By the way: I am not pleased with the check result if the test fails.
  It should report at least one function that is not called or a
  function that is called but was not expected.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/894842/+subscriptions