nunit-core team mailing list archive

[Rechenelf <894842@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

If we call 
mock.ExpectNoCall("NotExistingFunction");
no error is reported, even if the function not exists. 
In my eyeys this is a bug.

Other methods like Expect doesn't check the existence of the methode
name, too. I think this is the first thing they must do and report an
error like: method "NotExistingFunction" does not exist.

By the way: I am not pleased with the check result if the test fails. It
should report at least one function that is not called or a function
that is called but was not expected.

** Affects: nunit-3.0
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894842

Title:
  DynamicMock error

Status in NUnit Test Framework:
  New

Bug description:
  If we call 
  mock.ExpectNoCall("NotExistingFunction");
  no error is reported, even if the function not exists. 
  In my eyeys this is a bug.

  Other methods like Expect doesn't check the existence of the methode
  name, too. I think this is the first thing they must do and report an
  error like: method "NotExistingFunction" does not exist.

  By the way: I am not pleased with the check result if the test fails.
  It should report at least one function that is not called or a
  function that is called but was not expected.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/894842/+subscriptions