ocaml-maint team mailing list archive
-
ocaml-maint team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00548
[Bug 1061769] [NEW] sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
Public bug reported:
A recent change to sks packaging uses the dpkg-vendor command to
determine if the current OS derives from Ubuntu. dpkg-vendor is
provided by the dpkg-dev package, which sks does not, and should not
depend on.
In order for the postinst to behave properly, it needs to gracefully
handle the situation where the dpkg-vendor command does not exist.
** Affects: sks (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: sks (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: High
Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: sks (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: High
Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: In Progress
** Summary changed:
- sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev
+ sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
** Changed in: sks (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: sks (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
** Changed in: sks (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Also affects: sks (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: sks (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: High
Assignee: Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: sks (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: sks (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: sks (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dustin Kirkland (kirkland)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
OCaml Maintainers, which is subscribed to sks in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061769
Title:
sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor
should it)
Status in “sks” package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in “sks” source package in Precise:
In Progress
Status in “sks” source package in Quantal:
In Progress
Bug description:
A recent change to sks packaging uses the dpkg-vendor command to
determine if the current OS derives from Ubuntu. dpkg-vendor is
provided by the dpkg-dev package, which sks does not, and should not
depend on.
In order for the postinst to behave properly, it needs to gracefully
handle the situation where the dpkg-vendor command does not exist.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sks/+bug/1061769/+subscriptions
Follow ups
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Dan Streetman, 2021-11-16
-
[Bug 1061769] Update Released
From: Colin Watson, 2013-02-15
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2013-02-15
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Stefano Rivera, 2013-02-08
-
[Bug 1061769] [sks/precise] verification still needed
From: Brian Murray, 2013-02-06
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Stefano Rivera, 2012-10-05
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Adam Conrad, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Micah Gersten, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Adam Conrad, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Micah Gersten, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Adam Conrad, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Adam Conrad, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Dustin Kirkland, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] Re: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Micah Gersten, 2012-10-04
-
[Bug 1061769] [NEW] sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it)
From: Dustin Kirkland, 2012-10-04
References