ooc-dev team mailing list archive

[Amos Wenger <amoswenger@xxxxxxxxx>]

2010/6/3 Iván Hernández <ivanhv77@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> >
> >
> > I don't see the advantage of having a 'parameterized' method iterator
> > (also considering it's not possible to do something like that in ooc.
> > That's a C++-ism you're writing there, for a language with templates.
> > ooc has generics, which are different)
> >
> Of course. I missed this "little" detail. Two much time reading to
> Stepanov, I fear.
>
> > I think in that case, using templates is far-fetched and useless.
> Having two abstract classes like we discussed above solves neatly the
> problem, imho.
>
> I'm sorry, not to be aware of that solution. As I said, I'm being apart
> of Ooc for some time and I probably passed through the message where it
> was explained and I'm just experimenting yet with ooc, too. My sincere
> apologies.
> >
>

Of course, I understand - one only has 24h a day. Your suggestion would've
made perfect sense in C++/D. We're just a bit more focused on simplicity
here =)

Amos