opencog-dev team mailing list archive
-
opencog-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00456
Re: [OpenCog] Re: [OpenCog] Re: staging and main
2008/10/27 Joel Pitt <joel.pitt@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> code into the tree and saying "meh, it'll do something cool - later".
>
> Seesh, way to make our efforts diminutive Trent...
OK, got to take it down a notch. Joel, among others is working
hard.
Anyway, the conversation seems to be mostly academic
anyway; there seem to be only two branches grand-total,
at this point. We've talked abstractly about staging
branches as if there were a lot of them, but I guess
there's only two, Joel's, and Gama's, neither of which
are publically available. So I'm sort of at a loss about
why this all seems so very acrimonious.
--linas
References
-
staging and main
From: Joel Pitt, 2008-10-24
-
Re: staging and main
From: Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama, 2008-10-27
-
Re: staging and main
From: Linas Vepstas, 2008-10-27
-
Re: staging and main
From: Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama, 2008-10-27
-
Re: staging and main
From: Linas Vepstas, 2008-10-27
-
Re: staging and main
From: David Hart, 2008-10-27
-
Re: [OpenCog] Re: staging and main
From: Linas Vepstas, 2008-10-27
-
Re: [OpenCog] Re: staging and main
From: Cassio Pennachin, 2008-10-27
-
Re: [OpenCog] Re: staging and main
From: Trent Waddington, 2008-10-27
-
Re: [OpenCog] Re: staging and main
From: Joel Pitt, 2008-10-27