openjdk team mailing list archive

[Thierry Carrez <thierry.carrez@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

openjdk-6-jre-headless depends on libaccess-bridge-java, which
recommends libaccess-bridge-java-jni, which depends on multiple
graphical libraries (libglib2.0-0, libgtk2.0-0...)

This ends up pulling 12Mb of extra libraries on a jre-headless install
on a server, and jeopardizes the EucalyptusFitOnCdSpec objectives.

A solution could be to have:
* libaccess-bridge-java SUGGEST libaccess-bridge-java-jni
* openjdk-6-jre RECOMMEND libaccess-bridge-java-jni
That way you would get it installed on -jre and not installed on -jre-headless.

I'm not sure it makes sense from a java-access-bridge perspective,
though ?

** Affects: java-access-bridge (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
libaccess-bridge-java-jni recommendation pulls X libraries in a -headless install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395074
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenJDK,
which is subscribed to java-access-bridge in ubuntu.

Status in “java-access-bridge” package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
openjdk-6-jre-headless depends on libaccess-bridge-java, which recommends libaccess-bridge-java-jni, which depends on multiple graphical libraries (libglib2.0-0, libgtk2.0-0...)

This ends up pulling 12Mb of extra libraries on a jre-headless install on a server, and jeopardizes the EucalyptusFitOnCdSpec objectives.

A solution could be to have:
* libaccess-bridge-java SUGGEST libaccess-bridge-java-jni
* openjdk-6-jre RECOMMEND libaccess-bridge-java-jni
That way you would get it installed on -jre and not installed on -jre-headless.

I'm not sure it makes sense from a java-access-bridge perspective, though ?