openjdk team mailing list archive
-
openjdk team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #10285
Re: xulrunner-dev is gone
-
To:
Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:02:52 -0000
-
Cc:
libreoffice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mozilla-gnome-keyring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openvrml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stylish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, spice-xpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, npapi-vlc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gecko-mediaplayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, icedtea-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gnome-chemistry-utils@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, packagekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
Delivered-to:
icedtea-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
In-reply-to:
<20140611094132.GA24090@glandium.org>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> AFAICT, Ubuntu has a firefox-dev package that only contains NPAPI
> headers in /usr/include/firefox. I don't think that would be enough for
> all rdeps we have in Debian. I think some are not NPAPI plugins.
>
> Anyways, I guess most rdeps are just using the mozilla-*.pc files. I'll
> at least add the mozilla-plugin.pc one in next upload (which I'll do
> tomorrow morning, after I confirm only armel is broken). That should
> help most.
>
>> How about linking /u/i/xulrunner -> /u/i/iceweasel-N instead?
Thanks, way cleaner.
>> BTW would packaging npapi-sdk still be a good alternative?
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/642168
>
> Definitely, yes.
I've just uploaded it to mentors. Anyone interested in reviewing/sponsoring it?
http://mentors.debian.net/package/npapi-sdk
Packaging at https://github.com/gg0/npapi-sdk
Thanks,
--
G..e
Follow ups
References