openjdk team mailing list archive

[Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11.04.19 20:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi doko,
> 
> On 07-04-2019 12:08, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> I disagree.  I'll do the next upload with Samuel's proposed patches, not
>>> enabling that by default, together with the planned security update.  Then
>>> people can start testing if the wrapper works.
>>
>> Well, I'm afraid that what will happen is that the people who will
>> test will simply find out that it just works for them (just like it
>> does already for them with openjdk-8) ; will we then conclude near the
>> release that it should be enabled by default for Buster, and then be hit
>> by the much wider exposition to jaw?
>>
>> If on the contrary we enable it by default during the freeze, we will
>> have *way* more testing coverage, and thus be much more confident with
>> keeping it enabled by default in Buster if we don't see bug reports.
> 
> Although I agree with Samuel here, can we please-pretty-please get an
> upload even if you don't enable it, such that we can get this story into
> buster?

yes, will be part of the CPU update next week.