← Back to team overview
openjdk team mailing list archive
Thread
Date
openjdk team
Mailing list archive
Messages by thread
Messages by thread
Messages sent to the openjdk mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.
200 of 14779 messages, page
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
| 11 |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
Last
•
Next
•
Previous
•
First
[Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
,
(continued)
[Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
From: Laurent Bonnaud, 2023-09-24
[Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
Bug#878272: openjdk-9: Move the jmod files from openjdk-9-jre-headless to openjdk-9-jdk-headless
From: Emmanuel Bourg, 2017-10-11
[Bug 1722410] [NEW] java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
From: Andreas Hasenack, 2017-10-09
[Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-09
[Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-28
[Bug 1721852] [NEW] JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-06
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Don-vip, 2017-10-09
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-09
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-09
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Emmanuel Bourg, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Emmanuel Bourg, 2017-10-11
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Hans Joachim Desserud, 2017-10-13
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-19
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: John Neffenger, 2018-02-09
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Александр, 2018-02-09
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: John Neffenger, 2018-03-29
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Samuel Bühner, 2018-05-23
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: JPT, 2018-11-19
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2020-09-23
[Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
From: John Neffenger, 2020-09-23
[Bug 1721732] [NEW] Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead
From: Lachezar Dobrev, 2017-10-06
[Bug 1721732] Re: Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead
From: Lachezar Dobrev, 2017-10-06
[Bug 1721732] Re: Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
[Bug 1721397] [NEW] Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
From: Don-vip, 2017-10-04
[Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-05
[Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
From: Hans Joachim Desserud, 2017-10-18
[Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
From: Dan Streetman, 2021-11-16
Re: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
From: Mattia Rizzolo, 2017-10-04
Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
From: Olliver Schinagl, 2017-10-04
Bug#877679: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-07
Bug#877679: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
From: Olliver Schinagl, 2017-10-10
Bug#877523: openjdk-9 FTBFS with debhelper 10.9
From: Adrian Bunk, 2017-10-02
Bug#876545: src.zip is placed in a wrong directory
From: Evgeny Kapun, 2017-09-23
[Bug 1718934] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
From: Sergio Baronetti, 2017-09-22
[Bug 1718934] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
From: dino99, 2018-01-15
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-09-21
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Brian Murray, 2017-11-07
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-07
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-11-09
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-10
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-10
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-10
[Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2018-01-10
Bug#876051: i386 applications using JNI may crash due to Hotspot workaround for Exec Shield
From: Ben Hutchings, 2017-09-17
Bug#876069: i386 applications using JNI may crash due to Hotspot workaround for Exec Shield
From: Philip Hands, 2017-10-01
Bug#874555: openjdk-7: version in wheezy-lts is newer than anything else
From: Andreas Beckmann, 2017-09-07
Bug#874434: openjdk-8-jre-headless: uninstallable on armhf
From: Gianfranco Costamagna, 2017-09-06
Bug#874434: (no subject)
From: Gianfranco Costamagna, 2017-09-18
Bug#874292: openjdk-9: Please re-enable Zero builds for Hotspot archs
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-09-04
Bug#874265: openjdk-9: Please update zero-sparc.diff with version from upstream
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-09-04
[Bug 1714956] [NEW] OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
From: Jan Rüegg, 2017-09-04
[Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
From: Hans Joachim Desserud, 2017-09-04
[Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-09-05
[Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
From: Jan Rüegg, 2017-09-05
[Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
From: Jan Rüegg, 2017-09-05
[Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-11-05
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Harel Mazor, 2017-09-02
<Possible follow-ups>
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Leagnus, 2017-09-02
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-14
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-14
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Bug Watch Updater, 2017-10-27
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Bug Watch Updater, 2017-10-27
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2017-10-30
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Eduard Braun, 2017-12-13
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Norbert, 2018-01-30
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2018-02-15
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2018-02-15
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Bryce Harrington, 2018-05-12
Re: [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: krama, 2018-05-12
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Jean-, 2020-10-09
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Jean-, 2020-10-29
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2020-10-29
[Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2020-10-29
Bug#873254: classes.jsa is not removed on package uninstall
From: Evgeny Kapun, 2017-08-25
[Bug 1713043] [NEW] openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't install
From: Demitrius Belai, 2017-08-25
[Bug 1713043] Re: openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't install
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-08-25
Bug#873154: dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/etc/java-9-openjdk': Directory not empty
From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2017-08-25
Bug#873153: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2017-08-25
Bug#873104: openjdk-9: update-alternatives error + fail in updating
From: Nelson A. de Oliveira, 2017-08-24
Bug#872756: openjdk-9: Please replace zero-sparc.diff with simplified patch
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-20
[Bug 1710674] [NEW] Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-14
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-14
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-14
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-15
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-15
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-17
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-17
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-17
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-17
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-18
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-29
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-31
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-31
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-31
[Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-09-06
Bug#871606: openjdk-9: Please drop some unused patches
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-09
Bug#871319: openjdk-9: Please drop armel and sparc from altzero_archs
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-07
Bug#871316: openjdk-9: Please built with --with-debug-level=release on m68k
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-07
Bug#871031: openjdk-8-jre-headless: sparc64 error executing java -version
From: Aaron M. Ucko, 2017-08-06
Bug#871031: openjdk-8-jre-headless: sparc64 error executing java -version
From: James Clarke, 2017-08-06
Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-06
Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-06
Bug#871009: Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-08-06
Bug#871009: Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-06
[Bug 1708792] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
From: Gagan Shrestha, 2017-08-05
[Bug 1708792] Re: package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
From: Apport retracing service, 2017-08-05
[Bug 1708792] Re: package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
From: dino99, 2018-01-16
[Bug 1708299] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
From: Vicente Silva, 2017-08-02
[Bug 1708299] Re: package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
Bug#870521: openjdk-9: hardcoded Pre-Depends on multiarch-support
From: Aurelien Jarno, 2017-08-02
Bug#870520: openjdk-8: hardcoded Pre-Depends on multiarch-support
From: Aurelien Jarno, 2017-08-02
Bug#870403: openjdk-9: Please include patch to fix atomic_copy64 on powerpc
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-01
Bug#794502: openjdk-8-jre-headless: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64 symlink also dangling
From: Lionel Elie Mamane, 2017-07-30
[Bug 1707472] [NEW] package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u121-2.6.8-1ubuntu0.14.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
From: rajat agrawal, 2017-07-30
[Bug 1707472] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u121-2.6.8-1ubuntu0.14.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
From: Apport retracing service, 2017-07-30
[Bug 1707472] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u121-2.6.8-1ubuntu0.14.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2017-07-30
[Bug 1707140] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
From: Sieber, 2017-07-28
[Bug 1707140] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
From: Apport retracing service, 2017-07-28
[Bug 1707140] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-31
[Bug 1707140] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
[Bug 1707082] [NEW] regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-07-27
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Marc Deslauriers, 2017-07-28
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Robie Basak, 2017-07-28
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-07-28
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Steve Beattie, 2017-07-28
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-31
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-31
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-08-24
[Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
From: Francis Ginther, 2017-09-29
[Bug 1706969] [NEW] JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
From: Asier Lostale, 2017-07-27
[Bug 1706969] Re: JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-12-04
[Bug 1706969] Re: JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
From: Stefan Huehner, 2017-12-26
[Bug 1706969] Re: JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
[Bug 1706822] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 127
From: Leonardo, 2017-07-27
[Bug 1706822] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 127
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
[Bug 1706737] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jdk-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
From: Leandro Rojas, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706737] Re: package openjdk-8-jdk-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
[Bug 1706738] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
From: Leandro Rojas, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706738] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-29
[Bug 1706738] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
From: Daniel van Vugt, 2020-10-21
[Bug 1706567] [NEW] 8u141-b15-2~14.04 fails to install since latest update
From: amarraja, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706567] Re: 8u141-b15-2~14.04 fails to install since latest update
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706567] Re: 8u141-b15-2~14.04 fails to install since latest update
From: amarraja, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706567] Re: 8u141-b15-2~14.04 fails to install since latest update
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-08-24
[Bug 1706562] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jdk-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: 依赖关系问题 - 仍未被配置
From: 张舫, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706562] Re: package openjdk-8-jdk-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: 依赖关系问题 - 仍未被配置
From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
[Bug 1706442] [NEW] please add support for openjdk-8
From: Nick Gaya, 2017-07-25
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: Samuel Penn, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: Jesse S., 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: stevenschlansker, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: Samuel Penn, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: stevenschlansker, 2017-07-26
[Bug 1706442] Re: please add support for openjdk-8
From: Nick Gaya, 2017-07-26
Bug#869672: openjdk-8: Please update patch kfreebsd-support-hotspot.diff
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-25
Bug#869643: openjdk-8: Please update patch kfreebsd-support-jdk.diff
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-25
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#869643: openjdk-8: Please update patch kfreebsd-support-jdk.diff
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-25
Bug#869387: openjdk-9: Dangling link to VCS browser in debian/control
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-22
Bug#863888: issue in backport package
From: Matthias Klose, 2017-07-22
[Bug 1705763] [NEW] PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: bugproxy, 2017-07-21
[Bug 1705763] [NEW] PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-21
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Frank Heimes, 2017-07-21
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Steve Langasek, 2017-07-21
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Andrew Cloke, 2017-07-24
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-07-24
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Brian Murray, 2017-07-24
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-25
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-25
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-25
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Manoj Iyer, 2017-08-24
[Bug 1705763] Re: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" still seen after 8175813
From: Francis Ginther, 2017-09-29
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-13
Message not available
Bug#868255: closed by Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx> (Bug#868255: fixed in openjdk-9 9~b179-1)
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-22
Message not available
Bug#868255: closed by Matthias Klose <doko@xxxxxxxxxx> (Bug#868255: fixed in openjdk-9 9~b179-2)
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-24
Message not available
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-27
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-27
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-01
Message not available
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-01
Message not available
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-01
Message not available
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-01
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-01
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-02
Message not available
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-02
<Possible follow-ups>
Bug#868255: openjdk-9: Please build with --with-debug-level=slowdebug on Zero-only architectures
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-07-24
200 of 14779 messages, page
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
| 11 |
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
Last
•
Next
•
Previous
•
First