openjdk team mailing list archive

1. openjdk team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the openjdk mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8, (continued)
  • [Bug 1723893] Re: PPC64: Use cmpldi instead of li/cmpld is absent in OpenJDK 8
    From: Andrew Cloke, 2017-11-04
• [Bug 1723860] [NEW] PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: bugproxy, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723860] [NEW] PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: Frank Heimes, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: Steve Langasek, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: Francis Ginther, 2017-10-17
• [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: Dimitri John Ledkov, 2017-10-20
• [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-11-03
• [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: Andrew Cloke, 2017-11-04
• [Bug 1723860] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
  From: bugproxy, 2018-01-12
• [Bug 1723860] Re: PPC64: add Montgomery multiply intrinsic is absent currently in OpenJDK 8
  From: bugproxy, 2019-02-08
• [Bug 1723861] [NEW] PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: bugproxy, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723861] [NEW] PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Frank Heimes, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Manoj Iyer, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Steve Langasek, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Francis Ginther, 2017-10-17
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Dimitri John Ledkov, 2017-10-20
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-11-03
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Andrew Cloke, 2017-11-20
• [Bug 1723861] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
  From: bugproxy, 2018-01-12
• [Bug 1723861] Re: PPC64: Leverage extrdi for bitfield extract is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: bugproxy, 2019-02-08
• [Bug 1723862] [NEW] PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: bugproxy, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723862] [NEW] PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Frank Heimes, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Manoj Iyer, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Steve Langasek, 2017-10-16
• [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Francis Ginther, 2017-10-17
• [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Dimitri John Ledkov, 2017-10-20
• [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-11-03
• [Bug 1723862] Re: PPC64: Use andis instead of lis/and is absent in OpenJDK 8
  From: Andrew Cloke, 2017-11-04
• [Bug 1723862] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla
  From: bugproxy, 2018-01-12
• [Bug 1723417] [NEW] dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Laurent Bonnaud, 2017-10-13
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Laurent Bonnaud, 2019-04-10
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Laurent Bonnaud, 2021-04-05
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-01-27
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-01-27
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: sokai, 2022-01-27
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Laurent Bonnaud, 2023-03-30
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Pushkar, 2023-06-08
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Pushkar, 2023-06-08
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Pushkar, 2023-06-09
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Matthias Klose, 2023-06-12
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Pushkar, 2023-06-15
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Laurent Bonnaud, 2023-09-24
• [Bug 1723417] Re: dangling symlink: /usr/lib/jvm/java-*-openjdk-amd64/src.zip
  From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
• Bug#878272: openjdk-9: Move the jmod files from openjdk-9-jre-headless to openjdk-9-jdk-headless
  From: Emmanuel Bourg, 2017-10-11
• [Bug 1722410] [NEW] java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2017-10-09
• [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-09
• [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
  From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
  From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1722410] Re: java9: -version output seems wrong: "9-Ubuntu"
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-28
• [Bug 1721852] [NEW] JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-06
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Don-vip, 2017-10-09
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-09
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-09
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Emmanuel Bourg, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Emmanuel Bourg, 2017-10-11
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Hans Joachim Desserud, 2017-10-13
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in upstream OpenJDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: John Neffenger, 2017-10-19
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: John Neffenger, 2018-02-09
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Александр, 2018-02-09
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: John Neffenger, 2018-03-29
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Samuel Bühner, 2018-05-23
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: JPT, 2018-11-19
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2020-09-23
• [Bug 1721852] Re: JavaFX support is in Oracle JDK 9 but missing in Ubuntu OpenJDK 9
  From: John Neffenger, 2020-09-23
• [Bug 1721732] [NEW] Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead
  From: Lachezar Dobrev, 2017-10-06
• [Bug 1721732] Re: Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead
  From: Lachezar Dobrev, 2017-10-06
• [Bug 1721732] Re: Package openjdk-*-source depends on openjdk-*-jdk, should depend on openjdk-*-headless instead
  From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-10
• [Bug 1721397] [NEW] Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
  From: Don-vip, 2017-10-04
• [Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-05
• [Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
  From: Hans Joachim Desserud, 2017-10-18
• [Bug 1721397] Re: Backport final version of openjdk-9 to xenial
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-11-16
• Re: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
  From: Mattia Rizzolo, 2017-10-04
• Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
  From: Olliver Schinagl, 2017-10-04
• Bug#877679: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
  From: Matthias Klose, 2017-10-07
• Bug#877679: Bug#877679: java-8-openjdk (version 8u141-b15-1~deb9u1) fails to install if /usr/share/man is not available
  From: Olliver Schinagl, 2017-10-10
• Bug#877523: openjdk-9 FTBFS with debhelper 10.9
  From: Adrian Bunk, 2017-10-02
• Bug#876545: src.zip is placed in a wrong directory
  From: Evgeny Kapun, 2017-09-23
• [Bug 1718934] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
  From: Sergio Baronetti, 2017-09-22
• [Bug 1718934] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
  From: dino99, 2018-01-15
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-09-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Brian Murray, 2017-11-07
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-07
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-11-09
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-10
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-10
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Stefan Wahren, 2017-11-10
• [Bug 1714698] Re: java crashed with SIGABRT during "mvn package"
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2018-01-10
• Bug#876051: i386 applications using JNI may crash due to Hotspot workaround for Exec Shield
  From: Ben Hutchings, 2017-09-17
• Bug#876069: i386 applications using JNI may crash due to Hotspot workaround for Exec Shield
  From: Philip Hands, 2017-10-01
• Bug#874555: openjdk-7: version in wheezy-lts is newer than anything else
  From: Andreas Beckmann, 2017-09-07
• Bug#874434: openjdk-8-jre-headless: uninstallable on armhf
  From: Gianfranco Costamagna, 2017-09-06
• Bug#874434: (no subject)
  From: Gianfranco Costamagna, 2017-09-18
• Bug#874292: openjdk-9: Please re-enable Zero builds for Hotspot archs
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-09-04
• Bug#874265: openjdk-9: Please update zero-sparc.diff with version from upstream
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-09-04
• [Bug 1714956] [NEW] OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
  From: Jan Rüegg, 2017-09-04
• [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
  From: Hans Joachim Desserud, 2017-09-04
• [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-09-05
• [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
  From: Jan Rüegg, 2017-09-05
• [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
  From: Jan Rüegg, 2017-09-05
• [Bug 1714956] Re: OpenJDK segfaults randomly when running jenkins
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-11-05
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Harel Mazor, 2017-09-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Leagnus, 2017-09-02
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-14
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-10-14
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2017-10-27
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2017-10-27
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2017-10-30
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Eduard Braun, 2017-12-13
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Norbert, 2018-01-30
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2018-02-15
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2018-02-15
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Bryce Harrington, 2018-05-12
• Re: [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: krama, 2018-05-12
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Jean-, 2020-10-09
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Jean-, 2020-10-29
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2020-10-29
• [Bug 1226962] Re: Keyboard shortcuts (hotkeys) not functional in some cases in non-latin keyboard layouts
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2020-10-29
• Bug#873254: classes.jsa is not removed on package uninstall
  From: Evgeny Kapun, 2017-08-25
• [Bug 1713043] [NEW] openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't install
  From: Demitrius Belai, 2017-08-25
• [Bug 1713043] Re: openjdk-9-jre-headless_9~b181-3 doesn't install
  From: Matthias Klose, 2017-08-25
• Bug#873154: dpkg: warning: unable to delete old directory '/etc/java-9-openjdk': Directory not empty
  From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2017-08-25
• Bug#873153: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
  From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson, 2017-08-25
• Bug#873104: openjdk-9: update-alternatives error + fail in updating
  From: Nelson A. de Oliveira, 2017-08-24
• Bug#872756: openjdk-9: Please replace zero-sparc.diff with simplified patch
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-20
• [Bug 1710674] [NEW] Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-14
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-14
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-14
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-15
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-15
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-17
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-17
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-17
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-17
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-18
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-29
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-08-31
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-31
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-08-31
• [Bug 1710674] Re: Segmentation fault in os::write_memory_serialize_page
  From: Zhihong Yu, 2017-09-06
• Bug#871606: openjdk-9: Please drop some unused patches
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-09
• Bug#871319: openjdk-9: Please drop armel and sparc from altzero_archs
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-07
• Bug#871316: openjdk-9: Please built with --with-debug-level=release on m68k
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-07
• Bug#871031: openjdk-8-jre-headless: sparc64 error executing java -version
  From: Aaron M. Ucko, 2017-08-06
• Bug#871031: openjdk-8-jre-headless: sparc64 error executing java -version
  From: James Clarke, 2017-08-06
• Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-06
• Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-06
• Bug#871009: Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
  From: Matthias Klose, 2017-08-06
• Bug#871009: Bug#871009: openjdk-9: Please update the patch jdk-8067331.diff
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-06
• [Bug 1708792] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
  From: Gagan Shrestha, 2017-08-05
• [Bug 1708792] Re: package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
  From: Apport retracing service, 2017-08-05
• [Bug 1708792] Re: package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.17.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting a removal
  From: dino99, 2018-01-16
• [Bug 1708299] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
  From: Vicente Silva, 2017-08-02
• [Bug 1708299] Re: package openjdk-8-jre:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
  From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
• Bug#870521: openjdk-9: hardcoded Pre-Depends on multiarch-support
  From: Aurelien Jarno, 2017-08-02
• Bug#870520: openjdk-8: hardcoded Pre-Depends on multiarch-support
  From: Aurelien Jarno, 2017-08-02
• Bug#870403: openjdk-9: Please include patch to fix atomic_copy64 on powerpc
  From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, 2017-08-01
• Bug#794502: openjdk-8-jre-headless: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-amd64 symlink also dangling
  From: Lionel Elie Mamane, 2017-07-30
• [Bug 1707472] [NEW] package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u121-2.6.8-1ubuntu0.14.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
  From: rajat agrawal, 2017-07-30
• [Bug 1707472] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u121-2.6.8-1ubuntu0.14.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
  From: Apport retracing service, 2017-07-30
• [Bug 1707472] Re: package openjdk-7-jre-headless 7u121-2.6.8-1ubuntu0.14.04.3 failed to install/upgrade: cannot copy extracted data for './usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar' to '/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/rt.jar.dpkg-new': unexpected end of file or stream
  From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2017-07-30
• [Bug 1707140] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
  From: Sieber, 2017-07-28
• [Bug 1707140] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
  From: Apport retracing service, 2017-07-28
• [Bug 1707140] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-31
• [Bug 1707140] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless 8u131-b11-0ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/java-8-openjdk/management/jmxremote.password', which is different from other instances of package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64
  From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
• [Bug 1707082] [NEW] regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-07-27
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Marc Deslauriers, 2017-07-28
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Robie Basak, 2017-07-28
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Tiago Stürmer Daitx, 2017-07-28
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Steve Beattie, 2017-07-28
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-31
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-31
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-08-24
• [Bug 1707082] Re: regression on openjdk-8 caused by the S8169392 security update
  From: Francis Ginther, 2017-09-29
• [Bug 1706969] [NEW] JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
  From: Asier Lostale, 2017-07-27
• [Bug 1706969] Re: JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-12-04
• [Bug 1706969] Re: JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
  From: Stefan Huehner, 2017-12-26
• [Bug 1706969] Re: JavaDoc reports warning for methods named is*Property*
  From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
• [Bug 1706822] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 127
  From: Leonardo, 2017-07-27
• [Bug 1706822] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 127
  From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
• [Bug 1706737] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jdk-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
  From: Leandro Rojas, 2017-07-26
• [Bug 1706737] Re: package openjdk-8-jdk-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependencias - se deja sin configurar
  From: Thorsten Glaser, 2024-01-22
• [Bug 1706738] [NEW] package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
  From: Leandro Rojas, 2017-07-26
• [Bug 1706738] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2017-07-29
• [Bug 1706738] Re: package openjdk-8-jre-headless:amd64 8u131-b11-2ubuntu1.16.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: end of file on stdin at conffile prompt
  From: Daniel van Vugt, 2020-10-21
• [Bug 1706567] [NEW] 8u141-b15-2~14.04 fails to install since latest update
  From: amarraja, 2017-07-26

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status