openshot.developers team mailing list archive
-
openshot.developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00310
Re: Deprecate debs for 0.9.22
Thanks for doing that Andy.
That has cleared up some of the mess on the bug tracker.
I have just cleared up a little bit more of the duplicates, and asked
for info on others - marking them incomplete.
Gradually we are getting the bug tracker back into shape again. :-)
Best wishes, Helen
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 16:50 +0100, Andrew Finch wrote:
> Yes I don't mind doing it - I'm used to being a beast of burden :-)
>
> 2009/9/16 Helen McCall <wildnfree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hello Andy,
>
> I think it would be a good idea to mark them as released. This
> would
> clean up the bug tracker very nicely, and make it more
> manageable.
>
> Is everyone else in agreement with this?
>
> Andy; are you volunteering? :-)
>
> Best wishes, Helen
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:15 +0100, Andrew Finch wrote:
> > While we're at it, should we mark all the 'Fix committed'
> bugs as
> > released? Launchpad still regards them as open until you
> mark them as
> > Fix Released.
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > 2009/9/16 Jonathan Thomas <jonathan.oomph@xxxxxxxxx>
> > The .DEB installer on the download page has been
> updated to
> > Version 0.9.34. I'm not going to blog about the
> update quite
> > yet. Let's see if this new installer causes any big
> issues
> > first. =) It's quite a bit different than the
> previous one.
> > It has an improved "postinst" file, the new
> re-factored folder
> > structure, a new bin file, a new location
> (/usr/share instead
> > of /usr/local/share), and includes all of the mime,
> man,
> > pixmaps, and other installation files. It also
> includes the 7
> > most common language packs.
> >
> > I tested this locally, and in VirtualBox (on a clean
> Ubuntu
> > 9.04 64 bit system). It seemed to work great, so
> cross your
> > fingers.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Jonathan Thomas
> > <jonathan.oomph@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Helen, I agree with you. I have been
> planning on
> > updating the .deb with our newest version,
> but all the
> > re-factoring made me a bit hesitant.
> Anyway, I will
> > try and update the .deb soon.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Helen
> McCall
> > <wildnfree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I am re-sending this one because my
> earlier
> > send never arrived
> > from the list so might have got
> lost.
> >
> > A high proportion of the bug reports
> we are
> > currently getting all relate
> > to the experimental .deb packages
> for OpenShot
> > 0.9.22
> >
> > I am suggesting that these packages
> be removed
> > from the download, and
> > replaced with the new packages so
> that bug
> > reports are relevant to the
> > development of OpenShot.
> >
> > I have started a FAQ page on
> Launchpad, and
> > added a FAQ about upgrading
> > from 0.9.22
> >
> > If we remove 0.9.22 from the
> downloads I will
> > be able to then deprecate
> > the historic bug reports and we will
> then have
> > much more manageable bug
> > management.
> >
> > Best wishes, Helen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
References
