openstack-doc-core team mailing list archive

[Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxxx>]

On 05/28/2015 02:47 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@xxxxxxxx
> <mailto:aj@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     On 05/28/2015 02:28 AM, Lana Brindley wrote:
>
>         -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>         Hash: SHA1
>
>         Hi everyone,
>
>         On the back of the 'Team Structure' Design Summit session, I've
>         decided
>         to implement the new core reviewer process as discussed. I've
>         written it
>         up on the HowTo:
>         https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/HowTo#Achieving_core_reviewer_status
>
>
>     Please keep in mind that the stackalytics URL you give includes
>     security-doc and training-guides which have separate core teams, so
>     double check the entries.
>
>     I suggest to use reviewstats instead since it uses only the doc-core
>     repositories:
>
>     http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-30.txt
>     http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-90.txt
>
>     See also:
>     http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/reviewstats/tree/projects/docs.json
>
>         I'll initiate the first round of statistics-based approvals on
>         Monday,
>         so now is the time to yell if you don't like this plan, or think
>         I have
>         something backwards. Of course, if we do this once or twice and
>         decide
>         it sucks, then we can always change it in the future, too.
>
>
>     Let's see how it works out ;) I'll yell when I see comments.
>
>     Btw. I think our last additions were a bit premature, I don't see
>     Alexander at all in the last 30 days ;(
>
>
> Ah, good point.
>
> Lana, your write up is very oriented toward "achievement" and I think
> that you'll need to also add how we want to rotate people off of core.
>
> Also, on timing. Is every month a bit too much churn especially once you
> start removing people from core?

If we look at 30 and 90 stats, it shoiuld fine. People sure take 
vacations and shouldn't be removed for one month of inactivity.

> And then lastly, the debate always occurs about how "core" is not a
> badge but a review responsibility. How can we make it less of an
> "achievement" and more of a "responsibility" in the write-up?


I agree. core is really an extra responsibility!

> Thanks for doing this work -- definitely needed.

+1 ;)

Andreas

> Anne
>
>     How can we encourage and keep new comers? I suggest to reach out to
>     him and ask...


--
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton,
       HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126