openstack-poc team mailing list archive

[Jonathan Bryce <jbryce@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good. Since we didn't have any other items before the cutoff, no meeting tomorrow.


On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:

> No, that's fine as a status update. No need to bring this up tomorrow.
> 
> Thanks Jason!
> -jay
> 
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Bryce <jbryce@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanks, Jason.
>> 
>> Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>> Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project
>>>> from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been
>>>> made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in
>>>> Essex or Folsom...
>>> 
>>> I think Folsom is more likely to start seeing some more common code. Dan
>>> gave us some pointers to things in Quantum that he'd like to see ported
>>> over to common. Rajaram was going to start looking into adding a
>>> notification system with plugins, not sure if any progress has been made
>>> on that front.
>>> 
>>> I can only speak for myself, but I unfortunately won't be able to spend
>>> much time on it until after we finish our launch, but after that I'm
>>> going to make sure I get some time set aside in a few sprints to start
>>> pulling things in and proposing for incubation. First on my list would
>>> be using entry_points for defining services/daemons and console_scripts
>>> dynamically.
>>> 
>>> Happy Hacking!
>>> 
>>> 7-11
>>> 
>>