openstack-qa-team team mailing list archive

[Gigi Geoffrion <ginette.geoffrion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry lol I had thought I changed it to HTML format so the colors would
stick - my bad.

I included Matt on the email - its Matt Tesauro :)

The only other thing you missed below was that Sam Danes from my team -
also copied on this email.  Is going to take a whack at the first draft of
the gate definitions:

* We need to produce good, updated documentation on what different
categories of tests are -- smoke, fuzz, positive/negative, etc -- and
put this up on the wiki - Sam from my team will be working on this first
draft as agreed upon at the meeting

Gigi




On 10/22/12 1:23 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 10/22/2012 02:10 PM, Gigi Geoffrion wrote:
>> Hi Jay -
>> 
>> Thanks for sending this update -   My updates in Red below on a few
>> things :)
>
>Hmm, well, plain/text email doesn't have colors, but... see answers
>inline below :)
>
>> Great seeing you all who made the meeting that day!
>
>Indeed, great to catch up with you too!
>
>> Gigi
>> 
>>       One question I have is do we have sufficient space/hardware to
>> conduct the smoke, functional, integration tests we want to?
>
>Yes, I believe we do currently. Once we get parallelization of the
>tests, this will be much better, of course, and we should be able to
>lobby the PTLs of the core projects to gate on the full tempest test
>suite, not just the acceptance tests.
>> His name is Matt :)
>
>Ah, thank you! Does Matt have an email and last name? ;P
>
>Best,
>-jay
>
>>     For the record (and
>>     for the team member whose name I have forgotten, here is the
>>relevant
>>     link: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack-qa-team/msg00155.html
>>and
>>     https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack-qa-team/msg00156.html)
>> 
>>     Best,
>>     -jay
>> 
>>     On 10/19/2012 02:47 PM, Sean Gallagher wrote:
>> 
>>         Daryl,
>>         I wasn't able to make the follow-up meeting. :/
>>         Can you/ someone send out a recap?
>>         David: you had a list of items. Can you post or share that
>>         somewhere?
>>         We discussed Blueprints for managing some of the planning work.
>>         What about higher level planning docs? Useful? Do we have any?
>>         Should we?
>>         Re Google Hangout next week, I'm interested.
>>         -sean
>> 
>>