openstack team mailing list archive

[Ahmed El Gamil <ahmed@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jason,

I think you might wanna check this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nova@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00321.html

Worth mentioning that the "release" PPA is actually called "release" not
"stable" as mentioned in the above mail.

I hope this helps.

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Jason Cannavale <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> All,
>
>
> I'm not sure if this has been discussed before at any length, but I would
> like to discuss if it makes sense to have source code in the stable trunk
> and installable packages built and provided from the rapidly changing
> development trunk.
>
>
> For some background we've been working through some proof of concept
> deployments. Because the packages are coming from the development trunk we
> have been bitten repeatedly by having packages updated following code merges
> throughout the day. This has resulted in services such as networking no
> longer functioning. It seems to me, at least, that it would make sense to
> have a set of known working packages, packaged at each release point, in the
> stable trunk and having the source to build from in the development trunk.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Jason
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>