← Back to team overview

openstack team mailing list archive

Re: Allowing clients to pass capability requests through tags?

 

On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
> Right now, we're switching on the label, which is I think is a bad idea.  I need to capture this in a blueprint for Diablo, but what we're proposing is to expand the instance_types dictionary to include additional fields and possibly turn it into a full editable table so that openstack deployments can advertise additional capabilities as new instance_types beyond the Amazon defaults.

Some of this is already in flight (http://wiki.openstack.org/ConfigureInstanceTypesDynamically) … can you take a look at this and see if this could be extended to what you want ?
/k


Follow ups

References