openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00874
Re: Queue Service, next steps
I agree with this. Unless there are significant, obvious advantages to
Erlang I would suggest we stick with C/C++.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: openstack-bounces+john=openstack.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:openstack-bounces+john=openstack.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Tim Bell
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 2:08 PM
To: Eric Day; openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Queue Service, next steps
Please bear in mind the long term maintainability of the openstack package.
One of the attractive features at the moment is that there are not
significant pre-reqs to set up the environment and most mass market
environments can support it.
Using C++ would not significantly change this situation, whereas using
Erlang may create some more difficulty further down the line. Anything that
makes porting/rebuilding more difficult needs to be carefully thought
through.
Tim Bell
CERN
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References
-
Queue Service, next steps
From: Eric Day, 2011-02-17
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Brian Lamar, 2011-02-18
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Eric Day, 2011-02-18
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Thierry Carrez, 2011-02-21
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Chris Behrens, 2011-02-21
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-02-21
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Chris Behrens, 2011-02-21
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Eric Day, 2011-02-21
-
Re: Queue Service, next steps
From: Tim Bell, 2011-02-21