| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Ahh, well I would probably just add our copyright line below Jacob's in the LICENSE file for now, and maybe ping him to add the brief header to the old files. For new files, we can still add our standard copyright/license header. If add files under Apache, be sure to add LICENSE.Apache too for the full text. -Eric On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:20:16PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Eric Day wrote: > > For copyright headers, just add a new "Copyright 2011 OpenStack, > > LLC." line for existing files under the old copyright line. You can add > > a new license for new code for existing files, but that gets messy. For > > new files, just do as we usually do for new files (copyright + license > > brief). You can also add new files under a different license (Apache > > instead of BSD) if you like, but I'd probably keep it the same within > > one project for simplicity. Note that this is only suitable since > > it's BSD, if it were GPL (or some other viral license), it would be > > a bit different. > > In fact, the current files do not have any copyright header. Should we > invent the copyright line that should have been there, and add to it ? > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > Release Manager, OpenStack > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
