openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02491
Re: OpenStack API, Reservation ID's and Num Instances ...
On May 23, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On May 23, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Jorge Williams wrote:
>
>> If we make the instance ID a unique ID -- which we probably should. Why not also treat it as a reservation id and generate/assign it up front?
>
>
> Because that precludes the 1:M relationship of a reservation to created instances.
>
> If I request 100 instances, they are all created with unique IDs, but with a single reservation ID.
>
I don't see how that peculates anything. Treat the instance id as the reservation id on single instance creations -- have a separate reservation id when launching multiple instances. End of the day even if you have the capability to launch multiple instances at once you should be able to poll a specific instance for changes.
>
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
Follow ups
References
-
OpenStack API, Reservation ID's and Num Instances ...
From: Sandy Walsh, 2011-05-23
-
Re: OpenStack API, Reservation ID's and Num Instances ...
From: Jorge Williams, 2011-05-23
-
Re: OpenStack API, Reservation ID's and Num Instances ...
From: Jay Pipes, 2011-05-23
-
Re: OpenStack API, Reservation ID's and Num Instances ...
From: Jorge Williams, 2011-05-23
-
Re: OpenStack API, Reservation ID's and Num Instances ...
From: Ed Leafe, 2011-05-23