openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03711
Re: Issues with Packaging and a Proposal
-
To:
openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Monty Taylor <mordred@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:28:36 -0700
-
In-reply-to:
<CADu4cP0R5sf+cxsC5Vh_a=O7TmRdvSXEhP4UJ_0E-XkWiNG3dw@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
On 08/24/2011 03:09 PM, Michael Barton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Soren Hansen <soren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Rackspace isn't doing their own packaging because of (lack of) Debian
>> support. If they did, they'd have realised almost immediately that the
>> packages actually build on Debian. They're doing it because there'll
>> supposedly be differences in the behaviour Ubuntu (or any other distro
>> for that matter) will want and what Rackspace will want from the
>> packages. I've becried this divergence countless times, but to no
>> avail.
>>
>> That cloudbuilders aren't using the packages either.. I don't really
>> know what to say about that.
>
> Nobody's maintaining their own packaging because it's lots of fun, but
> we can't close shop every time someone decides to go and nerf the
> openstack packaging. Like right now, the openstack Swift packages are
> broken for the OS cloudfiles deploys on and they're missing useful
> features cloudfiles uses.
And as we add more deployment/integration testing - I would very much
like to prevent that sort of thing from happening so that you can use them.
Monty
References