openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05493
Re: Nexenta Driver proposal
Hi!
A few thoughts here, purely from a dev-process and CI perspective. I'm
personally thrilled to have driver around that has a team of folks
supporting it - but for OpenStack that has a few specific meanings.
First of all, I'm not in charge, but I'm pretty certain that there is no
way to get this added for diablo. The only things being merged into the
stable/diablo branch are backported fixes from trunk... so I'd
definitely focus your efforts on essex in the master branch.
To get the code into essex, you'll need to submit the code as a patch
via gerrit: http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow
When you are ready, you'll want to rebase and squash this into a single
commit on top of master. (it looks like it's a single commit in your
stable/diablo branch already, so you may be in good shape there)
Once you get it ready for master, there is the question of testing. The
CI team has been working with hooking in specialized hardware or
environments from vendors with needs into the OpenStack Jenkins. The
biggest needs we'll have here in order for this to be a first-class
citizen are:
- unittests for this code that can run in a normal x86-based ubuntu
cloud server
- a functional/integration test environment owned and operated by you
that is connected to and triggered by our jenkins on which versions of
openstack to be tested can be installed. I would expect this to be an
environment with solaris/nexenta and an installation of openstack
configured to use it.
We can totally work with you on figuring out how to integrate your
resources into our environment. As a starting place, check out how we're
doing this with our first bare-metal integration environment, which is a
set of machines provided by rackspace:
http://ci.openstack.org/jenkins.html#integration-testing
The specific steps don't need to look like that at all, but it might
give you a better idea of what we'll need to figure out how to get set up.
I don't think the integration environment needs to be a blocker to
getting stuff merged - after all, we're still working on getting that
for the mainline trunk - but ensuring that we've got unittests that are
runnable as part of our normal set of gating tests is essential, from my
point of view.
Thanks for the work so far!
Monty
On 11/14/2011 01:48 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
> All driver code is stamped with Apache Public License 2.0. Is it
> compatible with OpenStack licensing model?
> Currently driver supports Diablo branch of Nova, but we're working on
> changes to make it work on master.
> This driver was developed and tested in tight cooperation with Nexenta
> team, and will be supported by Nexenta.
>
> Kind regards, Yuriy.
>
> PS: Lost CC to mail list in my previous message, sorry.
>
> 2011/11/14 Diego Parrilla Santamaría
> <diego.parrilla..santamaria@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:diego.parrilla.santamaria@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
> Thank you Yuriy, it sounds really interesting. You have our support
> to move, test and improve this code in order to integrate it with
> master branch of Essex (and backport it to Diablo if necessary) once
> you release the code under the Openstack licensing model.
>
> It would be great if Nexenta supports this project too. Meanwhile,
> we will continue using the Solaris derivative version that also runs
> smoothly in the Nexenta Core Platform ;-)
>
> Regards
> Diego
>
> --
> Diego Parrilla
> <http://www.stackops.com/>*CEO*
> **www.stackops.com*
> <http://www.stackops.com/> | * diego.parrilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:diego.parrilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>**** | +34 649 94 43 29
> | skype:diegoparrilla*
> * <http://www.stackops.com/>
> *
>
> ****
>
> *
>
> ******************** ADVERTENCIA LEGAL ********************
> Le informamos, como destinatario de este mensaje, que el correo
> electrónico y las comunicaciones por medio de Internet no permiten
> asegurar ni garantizar la confidencialidad de los mensajes
> transmitidos, así como tampoco su integridad o su correcta
> recepción, por lo que STACKOPS TECHNOLOGIES S.L. no asume
> responsabilidad alguna por tales circunstancias. Si no consintiese
> en la utilización del correo electrónico o de las comunicaciones vía
> Internet le rogamos nos lo comunique y ponga en nuestro conocimiento
> de manera inmediata. Este mensaje va dirigido, de manera exclusiva,
> a su destinatario y contiene información confidencial y sujeta al
> secreto profesional, cuya divulgación no está permitida por la ley.
> En caso de haber recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que, de
> forma inmediata, nos lo comunique mediante correo electrónico
> remitido a nuestra atención y proceda a su eliminación, así como a
> la de cualquier documento adjunto al mismo. Asimismo, le comunicamos
> que la distribución, copia o utilización de este mensaje, o de
> cualquier documento adjunto al mismo, cualquiera que fuera su
> finalidad, están prohibidas por la ley.
>
> ***************** PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ****************
> We hereby inform you, as addressee of this message, that e-mail and
> Internet do not guarantee the confidentiality, nor the completeness
> or proper reception of the messages sent and, thus, STACKOPS
> TECHNOLOGIES S.L. does not assume any liability for those
> circumstances. Should you not agree to the use of e-mail or to
> communications via Internet, you are kindly requested to notify us
> immediately. This message is intended exclusively for the person to
> whom it is addressed and contains privileged and confidential
> information protected from disclosure by law. If you are not the
> addressee indicated in this message, you should immediately delete
> it and any attachments and notify the sender by reply e-mail. In
> such case, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution, copying or use of this message or any attachments, for
> any purpose, is strictly prohibited by law.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2011/11/14 Yuriy Taraday <yorik.sar@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:yorik.sar@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
> We already noted this version of Nexenta driver.
> We found out number of points which proof that this version of
> driver is better that modified Solaris driver:
> 1). it connects to Nexenta through Nexenta API, not SSH.
> It's faster, requires no extra overhead on both server and
> client sides.
> 2). it uses Nexenta services, not Solaris system tools directly.
> This assures that NexentaStor is aware of all operations and
> authorizes and accounts them accordingly. It is the recommended
> way to interact with Nexenta.
> 3). it supports snapshot operations.
> The snapshotting is totally missing from Solaris driver. Our
> driver supports it as much as it is possible.
> 4). it provides better error handling.
> All Nexenta-specific errors are wrapped in separate exception
> tree and are handled accordingly.
>
> Our driver is well-tested and waits for the first production
> deployment. We are ready to provide all necessary help and
> information on this.
>
> If you want to get some more details on it, you can attend this
> webinar: https://www3.gotomeeting.com/register/389257862. We're
> open for collaboration too.
>
> Kind regards, Yuriy.
>
>
>
> 2011/11/14 Diego Parrilla Santamaría
> <diego.parrilla.santamaria@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:diego.parrilla.santamaria@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
> Hi all,
>
> we have modified the Solaris volume driver code to work with
> Nexenta Block Storage. Actually, we have succesfully
> deployed solutions with Nexenta and Nova already.
>
> You can check the code here:
>
> https://github.com/StackOps/nova/tree/stable/diablo
>
> So, we are happy to collaborate on this.
>
> Regards
> Diego
> --
> Diego Parrilla
> <http://www.stackops.com/>*CEO*
> **www.stackops.com*
> <http://www.stackops.com/> | * diego.parrilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:diego.parrilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>**** | +34 649 94 43 29
> <tel:%2B34%20649%2094%2043%2029> | skype:diegoparrilla*
> * <http://www.stackops.com/>
> *
>
> ****
>
> *
>
> ******************** ADVERTENCIA LEGAL ********************
> Le informamos, como destinatario de este mensaje, que el
> correo electrónico y las comunicaciones por medio de
> Internet no permiten asegurar ni garantizar la
> confidencialidad de los mensajes transmitidos, así como
> tampoco su integridad o su correcta recepción, por lo que
> STACKOPS TECHNOLOGIES S.L. no asume responsabilidad alguna
> por tales circunstancias. Si no consintiese en la
> utilización del correo electrónico o de las comunicaciones
> vía Internet le rogamos nos lo comunique y ponga en nuestro
> conocimiento de manera inmediata. Este mensaje va dirigido,
> de manera exclusiva, a su destinatario y contiene
> información confidencial y sujeta al secreto profesional,
> cuya divulgación no está permitida por la ley. En caso de
> haber recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que, de
> forma inmediata, nos lo comunique mediante correo
> electrónico remitido a nuestra atención y proceda a su
> eliminación, así como a la de cualquier documento adjunto al
> mismo. Asimismo, le comunicamos que la distribución, copia o
> utilización de este mensaje, o de cualquier documento
> adjunto al mismo, cualquiera que fuera su finalidad, están
> prohibidas por la ley.
>
> ***************** PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ****************
> We hereby inform you, as addressee of this message, that
> e-mail and Internet do not guarantee the confidentiality,
> nor the completeness or proper reception of the messages
> sent and, thus, STACKOPS TECHNOLOGIES S.L. does not assume
> any liability for those circumstances. Should you not agree
> to the use of e-mail or to communications via Internet, you
> are kindly requested to notify us immediately. This message
> is intended exclusively for the person to whom it is
> addressed and contains privileged and confidential
> information protected from disclosure by law. If you are not
> the addressee indicated in this message, you should
> immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the
> sender by reply e-mail. In such case, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or
> use of this message or any attachments, for any purpose, is
> strictly prohibited by law.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Yuriy Taraday
> <yorik.sar@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:yorik.sar@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> The Openstack block volume storage demands high
> reliability and management automation. This can be
> achieved with specialized storage solutions, but
> Openstack still lacks integration with this type of
> storage back-ends.
>
> We have created a blueprint
> <http://wiki.openstack.org/NexentaVolumeDriver>on new
> volume driver for Nova that uses Nexenta appliance as
> storage. Driver is finished and working with Diablo
> version of Nova.
>
> We’re looking forward to any comments and suggestions.
> We hope our code can eventually be merged into master
> development branch with our support.
>
> Kind regards, Yuriy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References