openstack team mailing list archive

[Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thanks! So there is no way to reliably get the most-recent version of an
object under all conditions.

Does the same apply to object listings? I.e., when a PUT of a new object
returns, can I construct a situation where a subsequent listing of the
container contents will not include the new object?

Best,
Nikolaus


On 01/20/2012 03:05 PM, Stephen Broeker wrote:
> In this case, I believe that the GET will succeed.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@xxxxxxxx
> <mailto:Nikolaus@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     Sorry for being so persistent, but I'm still not sure what happens if
>     the 2 servers that carry the new replica are down, but the 1 server that
>     has the old replica is up. Will GET fail or return the old replica?
> 
>     Best,
>     Niko
> 
>     On 01/20/2012 02:52 PM, Stephen Broeker wrote:

   -Nikolaus

-- 
 »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

  PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6  02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C