openstack team mailing list archive

[Alejandro Comisario <alejandro.comisario@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi guys.
Its true that we are trying to make multizones work, actually we did, 
but we get into an instance were listing all vms from the parent zone ( 
where is has to go thru all the child zones ) is buggy ( if not 
impossible by now ).
So, if there is a new zone architecture that actually works ( we want to 
stop using our own deployer to do that ) or has a chance to be fully 
working when 2012-1 is out, (we would prefer not to wait till Folsom) we 
are totally into it ! since by now, we were actually waiting for this 
new Zones code to come out to try again.

Alejandro.

On 02/01/2012 06:17 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
> +1
>
> On Feb 1, 2012 4:13 PM, "Vishvananda Ishaya" <vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     I would prefer that if it can be done super-super fast. :)
>
>     Vish
>
>     On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Chris Behrens wrote:
>
>     > I wonder if we can use some of the architecture of the new code
>     and move the current implementation to that model.  It'd preserve
>     the existing functionality, set us up for the new implementation,
>     and fits in with 'cleanup' for E4, etc.
>     >
>     > On Feb 1, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
>     <vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>     >
>     >> I am all for pulling this out, but I'm a bit concerned with the
>     fact that we have nothing to replace it with. There are some
>     groups still trying to use it. MercadoLibre is trying to use it
>     for example. I know you guys are trying to replace this with
>     something better, but it would be nice not to break people for 7+
>     months
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> So I guess I have some questions:
>     >> 1.a) is the current implementation completely broken?
>     >>
>     >> 1.b) if yes, is it fixable
>     >>
>     >> 2) If we do remove this, what can we tell people that need
>     something like zones between now and the Folsom release?
>     >>
>     >> Vish
>     >> On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
>     >>
>     >>> As part of the new (and optional) Zones code coming down the
>     pipe, part of this is to remove the old Zones implementation.
>     >>>
>     >>> More info in the merge prop:
>     >>> https://review.openstack.org/#change,3629
>     >>>
>     >>> So, can I? can I? Huh?
>     >>> _______________________________________________
>     >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     >>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     >>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> _______________________________________________
>     >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     >> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     >> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp