openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08468
Re: Keystone database (using latest devstack)
On 2012-03-09, at 7:52 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> The data is stored in a python dictionary, inside of the metadata table. You will not be able to use SQL without an unwieldy wildcard search. IMO this seems overly complicated for a core function of the tool, and possibly the reason why listing user/tenant roles hasn't been implemented.
>
> ++
>
> I suspect the existing SQL schema has more to do with the default of using a key-value store until recently.
>
> I think that storing in the roles relationships in the "extra" column is a bit of premature optimization that is a little ill-conceived at this point -- it sacrifices functionality for a perceived performance improvement. I don't believe there's any evidence that the join to a roles table (or two joins for a mapping many-to-many relationship table) had an adverse impact on performance in the legacy Keystone.
>
> -jay
++
Storing data in a non-relational way when it is useful to access it in a relational way is doubleplusungood. If a cache in the "extra" column is needed for performance it can always be maintained in addition to a table with transactional updates.
Thanks,
Maru
References