Hi Wolfgang,
latest versions of our distro supports NFS as backend storage for
instances, volumes and images. Basically a zone shares the same NFS
mountpoint for instances and another mountpoint for volumes, and I guess
it does not differ a lot from what you want to do with FC or iSCSI.
It's in our immediate roadmap to use FC and iSCSI instead of NFS, but
may be you can give a try to our NFS stuff until then ;-)
Cheers
--
Diego Parrilla
<http://www.stackops.com/>*CEO*
**www.stackops.com* <http://www.stackops.com/> |
*diego.parrilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:diego.parrilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>****|
+34 649 94 43 29 | skype:diegoparrilla*
* <http://www.stackops.com/>
*
****
*
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Wolfgang Hennerbichler
<wolfgang.hennerbichler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:wolfgang.hennerbichler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
dear openstack godfathers;
I do plan to migrate from crappy vmware and some ibm based cloud
stack to openstack and kvm. here's the thing: I am lucky enough to
have decent hardware, all the compute nodes are interconnected via
fibre channel.
so I don't want and don't need iscsi. do you think I can make it
with something like clvm? I read through the docs of openstack, but
I am not really sure now if I can make clvm fly without hacking
around in openstack (and nova-volume) too much, especially when it
comes to live migration and so on...
I realize OpenStack was not built for SAN and FC, but I would really
like to hear your opinions on that.
Thanks,
Wolfgang
--
DI (FH) Wolfgang Hennerbichler
Software Development
Unit Advanced Computing Technologies
RISC Software GmbH
A company of the Johannes Kepler University Linz
_________________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~__openstack
<https://launchpad.net/~openstack>
Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~__openstack
<https://launchpad.net/~openstack>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/__ListHelp
<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>