openstack team mailing list archive

[Anne Gentle <anne@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Everett Toews
<everett.toews@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> On Jun 13, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote:
>
> >
> > So, for example:
> >
> > - diablo supports Identity API v2.0 and was extensible to support a
> non-OpenStack Identity API (v1.1)
> > - essex supports Identity API v2.0
> > - folsom supports Identity API v2.0
> > - grizzly supports Identity API v2.0 and Identity API v3.0
> > - havana will support Identity API v2.0 and Identity API v3.1
> > - icehouse will support Identity API v2.0 and at least Identity API v3.1
> (if not v3.2)
> > - J*release is not guaranteed to support Identity API v2.0 and will
> support at least Identity API v3.1 (if not v3.3)
>
> Does anyone think a matrix of OpenStack version to supported API version
> of each project would be useful to community developers?
>
> Should we include it in the documentation?
>

Seems like a good idea to me. Dolph's email was the first clear statement
I'd seen from any PTL on the subject, so I'll be watching this thread and
I'll log a doc bug if there's consensus and support to publish such a
table.

Anne


>
> The first column would be the OpenStack release, subsequent columns would
> be the projects, and the cells would be versions.
>
> For example (I hope my formatting works),
>
> Release    | Keystone | Nova | etc
> Diablo     | 2.0      | x.x  | x.x
> Essex      | 2.0      | x.x  | x.x
> Folsom     | 2.0      | x.x  | x.x
> Grizzly    | 2.0, 3.0 | x.x  | x.x
> Havana     | 2.0, 3.1 | x.x  | x.x
> Icehouse   | 2.0, 3.1 | x.x  | x.x
> J          | 3.1      | x.x  | x.x
>
> Everett
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>