oqgraph-dev team mailing list archive
-
oqgraph-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00293
Re: Fwd: Re: Serious use after free bug
Sure thing, I'll look at the others as well. I meant to say federatedx BTW
not federated, I saw the readme. Also I meant reset() not disconnect()! (oops)
On 18/06/14 18:39, Arjen Lentz wrote:
> Oops I intended to send to list.
>
>
> Hi Andrew
>
>> Arjen Lentz <arjen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> You may need some advice on how to ensure that when a connection closes,
>>> things get cleaned up properly. We may have missed a hook of some sort.
>>> You could also check this in another engine. Perhaps Federated, or
>>> Spider, or CONNECT ?
>
> On 18/06/14 19:03, Andrew McDonnell wrote:
>> From a very cursory look at federated it seems we dont have
>> `handler::disconnect()` so I'll probably start there.
>> Meantime in the medium term I think refactoring ha_oqgraph.cc
>> to look more like ha_federated would be a worthwhile activity
>
> Federated is probably not the best example.
> It's in the best case a fixed up version of something quite old.
> Look at others also (CONNECT is the newest, but Spider also - and
> perhaps TokuDB ?) and roughly document which we can then run by Serg and
> others first.
> This also provides the opportunity to get other people in the community
> involved in some of the refactoring work, which has the advantage of
> getting more people familiar with the codebase!
>
>
> Regards,
> Arjen.
Follow ups
References