oship-dev team mailing list archive

[Roger Erens <roger.erens@xxxxxxxxx>]

on 22-5-2009 1:59 Tim Cook wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 00:41 +0200, Roger Erens wrote:
>
> > I would favor to have some trunk snapshot (a 'revision') be tagged 
> > 'version-1.0a1' or whatever label you like. And skip the trouble of 
> > exporting to a tar.gz release.
> >
> > Roger
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback.  I have to say that I agree with all of your
> comments. 
>
> Now for the work part.
>
> There are a number of Blueprints that I have assigned to release 1.0  
> Of course that means 1.0b1 - feature freeze, looking for bugs.  
>
> So, where are the breaks in features that we need for 1.0a(xxx) tags?  

At a milestone?

> IMHO, if we are going to have these then they need to be discussed and
> planned.  Then they (the Blueprints) should be attached to those release
> tags so developers can easily look and see what they are supposed to be
> building against and testing.  

+1

> Do you (the collective you) want me to be solely responsible for making
> those determinations?

As long as you're the release manager, yes. Let's say until the EOY (end 
of year). Then we'll see who else have come to terms with OSHIP to 
provide meaningful input. And is able to push people forward to a release.

  I can and will.  I would prefer your input
> though.

Mine (personally) will probably be restricted to +1/-1/0/?. But I don't 
like restrictions :-)

> Cheers,
> Tim

Roger