oxide team mailing list archive

[Olivier Tilloy <olivier.tilloy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Olivier Tilloy
<olivier.tilloy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Olivier Tilloy
> <olivier.tilloy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Chris Coulson
>> <chris.coulson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 03/02/15 18:00, David Barth wrote:
>>>
>>> The call today focused mostly on the current bugs.
>>>
>>> 1. Release
>>>
>>> 1.4.0 in vivid. deferring the publication in rtm while we resolve other
>>> issues
>>>
>>>
>>> We should be trying to get 1.5 in vivid so that it has some testing.
>>> Deferring 1.4 in RTM means that it's vulnerable to everything in
>>> http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2476-1/, which is pretty bad.
>>
>> I’ve just filed two landing request: one for oxide 1.4.2 in RTM, and
>> one for 1.5.0 in vivid. Waiting for the CI team to assign silos and do
>> the necessary source/binary copies. Let’s try and land both early next
>> week.
>
> oxide 1.5.0 for vivid is already available in silo 3
> (https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/landing-003/+packages)
> oxide 1.4.2 for RTM is currently building in silo 4
> (https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu-rtm/landing-004/+packages)

I’m currently testing silo 4 (oxide 1.4.2 for RTM), done with the
webbrowser-app test plan (so far so good), now going to test webapps.

Again, more testing and feedback would be appreciated, ideally I’d
like to land it today or tomorrow (I’ll be offline Thursday and
Friday). Please test your favourite websites/webapps and let me know
if you find regressions.

Thanks,

 Olivier