p2psp team mailing list archive

[Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo <juanalvaro83@xxxxxxxxx>]

>1. Relax the rules that the peers and the splitter use to reject the
>un-supportive peers.

What do you have in mind? A higher threshold?

Here's an idea to reward efficient peers: the faster a peer sends his packets, the higher he should be in the peer list of the rest of the team (I place good peers at the beginning of my peer list so they are rewarded by receiving my packets sooner). Thus, "fast" peers would be progressively climbing to the first positions of all peer lists in the team during a session.

However, we have no way of measuring how fast packets arrive yet. Any suggestion?

Juan

-- 
Enviado desde mi teléfono con K-9 Mail.