percona-discussion team mailing list archive
-
percona-discussion team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00668
Re: new performance results
Mark,
Yes, thanks for results.
I am getting lost in different patches...
One should categorize them :)
We will back to performance soon, currently we are working on
export / import single .ibd between servers.
http://www.percona.com/docs/wiki/percona-xtradb:patch:innodb_expand_import
MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
> I published details of the v4 google patch and performance comparisons
> between it and xtradb for MySQL 5.1.34 here:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-mysql-tools/wiki/InnodbIoPerformance
>
> Some of the results are odd. For example, xtradb with
> innodb_max_dirty_pages_pct=20 was faster on some tests than xtradb
> with it set to 80. Perhaps other my.cnf variables have bad settings?
>
> My work is so much easier now that I have something good with which to
> compare it. I am still trying to explain all of the results. That task
> would be easier if xtradb displayed more Innodb variables in SHOW
> STATUS output (hint, hint).
>
>
--
Vadim Tkachenko, CTO
Percona Inc.
ICQ: 369-510-335, Skype: vadimtk153, Phone +1-888-401-3403
MySQL Performance Blog - http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com
MySQL Consulting http://www.percona.com/
Follow ups
References