pkgme-devs team mailing list archive
-
pkgme-devs team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00023
REJECT: pkgme
Hi,
I'm sorry to inform you that pkgme is being rejected for the following
reason:
* debian/copyright says that all files are GPL-2, however
setup_helpers.py is LGPL and several others are GPL-3. Please use
the licensecheck command and update debian/copyright accordingly
* debian/changelog lists the uploader as 'pkgme developers
<pkgme-devs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>'. This is highly unusual and is
not strictly true. While the uploader may be in pkgme-devs, all of
pkgme-devs did not upload this package. It is important that the
uploader be listed as an actual person and the package signed by
this person.
* the package does not provide a watch file. While this is the
preferred method, if this is not possible, please consider adding a
comments only watch file, a README.source file with clear
instructions on how the source tarball was generated or use
get-orig-source in debian/rules. This is required to verify the
integrity of the source package.
* the checksum for pkgme_0.1.tar.gz does not match that at
https://launchpad.net/pkgme/trunk/0.1/+download/pkgme-0.1.tar.gz/+md5
* the package is a native package. Usually this is a mistake. The
packaging should instead use an orig.tar.gz and a version of the
form 0.1-0ubuntu1. Doing this would also fix the previous issue.
After making these changes, feel free to reupload.
Thanks!
--
Jamie Strandboge | http://www.canonical.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part