qreator-discuss team mailing list archive
-
qreator-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00004
Re: SMS format comparison
Al 10/11/12 09:51, En/na Stefan Schwarzburg ha escrit:
> Hi David,
>
> I tested the dataformat:
> SMSTO:<number>
> and
> SMSTO:<number>:<message>
> with 12 free iPhone apps and 1 Maemo app.
>
> There are five categories:
>
> 1) does handle both formats
> 2) does handle format without message and treats format with message as
> if there was none
> 3) does handle format without message but treats format with message as
> if message was part of the number
> 4) does handle format without message but refuses to do anything with a
> message
> 5) does not handle either format
>
> iPhone:
> 1) "Qrafter", "in-nigma", "Scan", "QRReader"
> 2) "QR Scan!"
> 3) "NeoReader"
> 4) "QR-Scanner+", "Bakodo",
> 5) "quick scan", "zbar", "QR Reader+", "Scan Life"
>
> N900:
> 4) mbarcode
>
> I think:
> 1) and 2) are ok [+1]
> 3) is strange [0]
> 4) is bad [-1]
> 5) is a bad app [0]
>
>
> Currently it would be 5:3 for the message part.
> Note however, that with mbarcode for the N900, I also tested the format:
> sms:<number>?body=<message> and that works...
>
> Do you have any android phone where you can test this as well?
>
Yeah, I've got an Android where I can test it. Let me see if I can get
to it later on today and report back.
Also, would you mind re-sending the list of SMS types you sent on your
original message?
I wasn't yet subscribed to the list and trying to get the file from the
archive [1] gives me garbled results.
Thanks.
[1] https://lists.launchpad.net/qreator-discuss/msg00000.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
References