quickly-talk team mailing list archive

[Umang Varma <umang.me@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/22/2010 01:20 PM, Michael Terry wrote:
> I had the thought that maybe it would be best if we made our (the
> Quickly project's) intentions and ownership more clear to users (and
> thus to us :)).
> 
> For example, what if we had the following layout:
> bin/project_name
> python/...
> python_quickly/...
> 
> And the only thing the user was expected to change was code in python/.
> So we'd strip that down as much as possible.  All the helper code and
> base classes move to python_quickly.  The bin script is also ours, for
> wrapper code.
> 
> There would be well-defined entry points into the python module
> (notably, for the main window).  But by keeping those to a minimum, we
> could change our code easier.
> 
> So a quickly upgrade would just replace the code in bin and
> python_quickly.  Tada!  The efficacy of this would depend on how well we
> could segregate the two, but it seems worth investigating.
I like this!

Except calling a python module/package "python" doesn't sound very nice
to me. Could we s/python/project_name/ ?