registry team mailing list archive

1. registry team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the registry mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down, (continued)
  • [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down
    From: Robbie Williamson, 2010-09-29
  • [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down
    From: Magnus Helander, 2010-11-01
  • [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down
    From: Magnus Helander, 2010-11-01
  • [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down
    From: Magnus Helander, 2010-11-01
  • [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down
    From: Magnus Helander, 2010-11-01
  • [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down
    From: eisbaw, 2010-11-19
  • Re: [Bug 272247] Re: System freezes during boot, unless I hold a key down
    From: Stefan Bader, 2010-11-19
• [Bug 220706] Re: Boot fails on ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
  From: Jeremy Foshee, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 220706] Re: Boot fails on ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
  From: Jeremy Foshee, 2010-06-03
• Re: [Bug 220706] Re: Boot fails on ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
  From: snoble, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 220706] Re: Boot fails on ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
  From: Jeremy Foshee, 2010-06-07
• [Bug 220706] Re: Boot fails on ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
  From: Fabián Rodríguez, 2010-07-09
• [Bug 364344] Re: daily autocommits with etckeeper/hg cause cron emails
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-15
• [Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-16
• [Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
  From: Nobu, 2010-12-01
• Re: [Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
  From: Chow Loong Jin, 2010-12-02
• [Bug 450260] Re: grub-probe fails with btrfs root (and ext3 /boot)
  From: Colin Watson, 2011-01-04
• [Bug 307494] Re: Generates incorrect Packages file
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 307494] Re: Generates incorrect Packages file
  From: Bhavani Shankar, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 307494] Re: Generates incorrect Packages file
  From: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio, 2010-06-23
• [Bug 325235] Re: unp: suggests package 7z not in ubuntu
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 490451] Re: Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 490451] Re: Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
  From: seph, 2010-06-13
• [Bug 490451] Re: Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
  From: Colin Watson, 2010-06-15
• [Bug 490451] Re: Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
  From: Colin Watson, 2010-06-29
• [Bug 490451] Re: Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
  From: Brian J. Murrell, 2010-07-16
• [Bug 490451] Re: Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
  From: stchesmeli, 2010-10-14
• [Bug 490451] Re: Unable to set multiple grub terminals using /etc/default/grub
  From: Piotr, 2010-11-01
• [Bug 80635] Re: Please disable flow-control by default
  From: mp3foley, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 580569] Re: Install is missing a symbolic link
  From: Daniel Leidert, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 580569] Re: Install is missing a symbolic link
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 223211] Re: [Hardy] uim-pref-qt doesn't work
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 223211] Re: [Hardy] uim-pref-qt doesn't work
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-25
• [Bug 245947] Re: bandwidthd fails to preconfigure
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 245947] Re: bandwidthd fails to preconfigure
  From: rEnr3n, 2010-08-09
• [Bug 245947] Re: bandwidthd fails to preconfigure
  From: Jean-Baptiste Lallement, 2010-08-26
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: Paul Sinnett, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: Paul Sinnett, 2010-06-05
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: Leonardo, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: TGP1994, 2010-09-12
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: Mark Fraser, 2010-09-21
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: TGP1994, 2010-09-21
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: Robbie Williamson, 2010-09-21
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: Robbie Williamson, 2010-09-21
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: TGP1994, 2010-09-21
• [Bug 283316] Re: CD-ROM tray closes automatically after eject
  From: Alan, 2010-09-23
• [Bug 397212] Re: Scrolling artifacts on some guests
  From: Anthony Liguori, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 319014] Re: serial usb-device can't be passed-through to a guest
  From: Anthony Liguori, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 319014] Re: serial usb-device can't be passed-through to a guest
  From: Nico Prenzel, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 80233] Re: Recommends line contains two arch-specific and three Suggests entries.
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 80233] Re: Recommends line contains two arch-specific and three Suggests entries.
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-04
• [Bug 390528] Re: pulseaudio keeps complaining: module-console-kit.c: GetUnixUser() call failed: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "GetUnixUser" with signature "" on interface "org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Session" doesn't exist
  From: Leigh L. Klotz, Jr., 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 390528] Re: pulseaudio keeps complaining: module-console-kit.c: GetUnixUser() call failed: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "GetUnixUser" with signature "" on interface "org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit.Session" doesn't exist
  From: Tom Howland, 2010-06-17
• [Bug 546458] Re: kernel NULL pointer in -virtual (-server) kernel
  From: Anthony Liguori, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 546458] Re: kernel NULL pointer in -virtual (-server) kernel
  From: C de-Avillez, 2010-06-10
• [Bug 546458] Re: kernel NULL pointer in -virtual (-server) kernel
  From: Jeremy Foshee, 2010-06-21
• [Bug 546458] Re: kernel NULL pointer in -virtual (-server) kernel
  From: Chase Douglas, 2010-06-21
• [Bug 588809] Re: cyrillic symbols become strange
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-06-02
• Re: [Bug 588809] Re: cyrillic symbols become strange
  From: Anton Zaviyalov, 2010-06-28
• [Bug 588809] Re: Re: cyrillic symbols become strange
  From: Anton Zaviyalov, 2010-06-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 588809] Re: cyrillic symbols become strange
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-06-26
• [Bug 588809] Re: cyrillic symbols become strange
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-09-29
• [Bug 588809] [NEW] cyrillic symbols become strange
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Travis Watkins, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Tony Pursell, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Augustin, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Tony Pursell, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Tony Pursell, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Augustin, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Augustin, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Augustin, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-05
• Re: [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-05
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Doug Morse, 2010-06-06
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Doug Morse, 2010-06-06
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-06
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Doug Morse, 2010-06-06
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-06
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-06
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-07
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-07
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Rob S, 2010-06-08
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-09
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Andras Muranyi, 2010-06-14
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Andras Muranyi, 2010-06-14
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: André Desgualdo Pereira, 2010-06-21
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: d0ti5, 2010-06-22
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: André Desgualdo Pereira, 2010-06-22
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: André Desgualdo Pereira, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Michał Gołębiowski, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 467668] Re: [regression-release] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Paul van Genderen, 2010-07-29
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: ScottMiller, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Witold Baryluk, 2010-06-28
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Hernando Torque, 2010-07-04
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Fabien Tassin, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Matthias Klose, 2010-07-12
• Re: [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Giuseppe Iuculano, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Micah Gersten, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Fabien Tassin, 2010-07-12
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Colin Mills, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Fabien Tassin, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Colin Mills, 2010-07-15
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-08-23
• [Bug 529242] Re: chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-09-02
• [Bug 551810] Re: Mythweb: Play Recording on Frontend -> Error Page
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 551810] Re: Mythweb: Play Recording on Frontend -> Error Page
  From: David Dean, 2010-10-25
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for -synaptics
  From: RussianNeuroMancer, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for -synaptics
  From: Vish, 2010-07-03
• [Bug 308191] Re: Multitouch support not available for -synaptics
  From: RussianNeuroMancer, 2010-07-03
• [Bug 121768] Re: manpage for ld.so mistake
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: crazydave, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: Gijs Molenaar, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: Scott Moser, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: Gijs Molenaar, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: Herr Irrtum, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: crazydave, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: crazydave, 2010-06-16
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: crazydave, 2010-06-18
• [Bug 482836] Re: Samba shared printers not accessible under Vista and Windows7
  From: Herr Irrtum, 2010-06-18
• [Bug 293000] Re: hardy: openssh-server oom_adj can lead to denial of service
  From: Nathan Catlow, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 293000] Re: hardy: openssh-server oom_adj can lead to denial of service
  From: Charlie Kravetz, 2010-10-21
• [Bug 293000] Re: hardy: openssh-server oom_adj can lead to denial of service
  From: leighman, 2010-10-21
• [Bug 493145] Re: [Lucid] NFS kernel server doesn't work anymore with 2.6.32
  From: Bart Verwilst, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 493145] Re: [Lucid] NFS kernel server doesn't work anymore with 2.6.32
  From: Simon, 2010-12-28
• [Bug 493145] Re: [Lucid] NFS kernel server doesn't work anymore with 2.6.32
  From: Simon, 2010-12-28
• [Bug 493145] Re: [Lucid] NFS kernel server doesn't work anymore with 2.6.32
  From: Philip Muškovac, 2010-12-28
• [Bug 388483] Re: smbd panic action with yield_connection name=0x0
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 388483] Re: smbd panic action with yield_connection name=0x0
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 388483] Re: smbd panic action with yield_connection name=0x0
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 388483] Re: smbd panic action with yield_connection name=0x0
  From: XabiX, 2010-06-30
• [Bug 587976] Re: Panic or segfault in Samba
  From: Thierry Carrez, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Henning Moll, 2010-06-28
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Dustin Jacobsen, 2010-07-05
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Rolf Leggewie, 2010-07-06
• Re: [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-07-06
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Omer Akram, 2010-07-06
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Mantas Kriaučiūnas, 2010-07-31
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Vish, 2010-08-08
• [Bug 138194] Re: Closing lid during initial shutdown causes notebook to suspend
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-09-16
• [Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
  From: Michael Nagel, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
  From: Andrew Starr-Bochicchio, 2010-10-13
• [Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
  From: Jonathan Marsden, 2010-10-13
• [Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
  From: landroni, 2010-12-24
• [Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
  From: landroni, 2010-12-24
• [Bug 105458] Re: [needs-packaging] HandBrake
  From: landroni, 2010-12-24
• [Bug 467668] Re: Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Leo, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Session manager lacks backward compatibility, making the desktop session unusable
  From: Leo, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Session manager lacks backward compatibility, making the desktop session unusable
  From: Doug Morse, 2010-06-05
• [Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Session manager lacks backward compatibility, making the desktop session unusable
  From: Leo, 2010-06-05
• [Bug 467668] [NEW] Neither compiz nor metacity nor nautilus are run at start
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 572617] Re: [regression-release] Compiz fails to decorate windows after upgrade
  From: Leo, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 572617] [NEW] [regression-release] Compiz fails to decorate windows after upgrade
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 273294] Please test proposed package
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2010-06-02
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-06-02
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2010-06-03
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Fabián Rodríguez, 2010-07-07
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Curtis Gedak, 2010-07-07
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2010-07-19
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Jonathan Riddell, 2010-07-20
• Re: [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Colin Watson, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Curtis Gedak, 2010-07-20
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Colin Watson, 2010-07-21
• Re: [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Curtis Gedak, 2010-07-21
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-23
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Martin Pitt, 2010-07-23
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Colin Watson, 2010-07-23
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-07-23
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Ameet Paranjape, 2010-08-02
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2010-08-03
• [Bug 588530] Re: Automounting not prevented with GParted in Ubuntu 10.04
  From: Dallman Ross, 2010-08-03

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status