rohc team mailing list archive
-
rohc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00302
Re: ROHC on a wireless link
-
To:
<rohc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Didier Barvaux <didier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:27:23 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAKU8ZfJ4xhNEj1obo+caIU+ivQ8AEAAAABiY8IPLDzxNjGaHVVhhYIsBAAAAAA==@gmail.com>
Hello,
> As you have
> suggested that ROHC packets may be transmitted in replacement to the
> IP packets....could you please elaborate on this ?
I mean that you may transmit the ROHC packet at the same level as the
IP protocol in the protocol stack.
> I am beginning to
> think it might be a lot more efficient to run a routing daemon or use
> the iproute2 in the kernel mode to achieve this based on the address
> fields. Then again, my thoughts are the processing would be too much
> task. What do you think ?
I might not understand you correctly, but you seems to mix routing
(routing daemon, BATMAN and iproute2) and compression (ROHC). Also,
iproute2 is not located in the Linux kernel. It is a userspace tool
that allows you to configure network-related things in the kernel.
Regards,
Didier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
References