rohc team mailing list archive
-
rohc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01637
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
> Here is more info. I also get a few of these
>
> rohc_lsb_decode() assert
> cannot use scaled TCP sequence number for a packet with an
> empty payload.
>
> In this case, the payload_len is 0. Is this caused by mismatched
> list options, or something else? Thanks,
Something else. The compressor seems to have used the scaling encoding
for the TCP sequence number of a packet without payload. That's not
allowed. I fixed a similar problem at revision 1085. What revision do
you use?
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 1085
committer: Didier Barvaux
branch nick: rohc-main
timestamp: Sun 2014-04-27 19:15:21 +0200
message:
TCP profile: do not compute the scaled TCP sequence number if the TCP
payload is empty
------------------------------------------------------------
If you use one older revision, please test again with the latest
revision. If not, could you tell me the ROHC packet (co_common, rnd_X,
seq_X...) for which the decompressor emits those warnings?
Regards,
Didier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Follow ups
References
-
ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-03
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-06
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-07
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-08
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-10
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-11
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-11
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-20
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-23
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-24
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-24
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-24
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-29
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-29