← Back to team overview

rohc team mailing list archive

R: Re: Overrun packets using rochtunnel application

 

Hi Didier,

Thank you for your quick reply.

I installed the 1.7.0 version of rohc library but I had an error when
tried to install the iprohc-0.7.1.

The error message appears when I enter the "make all" command:

adminuser@adminuser-VirtualBox:~/iprohc-0.7.1$ make all
Scanning dependencies of target iprohc_common

[ 18%] Building C object common/CMakeFiles/iprohc_common.dir/tun_helpers.c.o
/home/adminuser/iprohc-0.7.1/common/tun_helpers.c:31:24: fatal error:
libnetlink.h: No such file or directory
 #include <libnetlink.h>
                        ^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [common/CMakeFiles/iprohc_common.dir/tun_helpers.c.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [common/CMakeFiles/iprohc_common.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2


>Hello,

>> I'm using the rohctunnel application between two machines directly
>> connected via fastethernet cards.
>> I started the rohctunnel in both machines, tested it using pings and
>> everything works fine.
>> The problem appears when I tested with iperf. When I use rates above
>> 100 kbps the "TX overruns" counter of the rohc0 interface (of the
>> client machine) increase in a high rate.
>> This problem also happens when I made a test using VoIP traffic. When
>> I tried to use rohctunnel with more than 3 calls (G.729), I had this
>> overrun problem and a degradation in my call statistics (jitter,
>> packet loss...). Do you know what could be wrong? Could it be a bug?
>>
>> I'm using version 1.6.1 of rohc library and configured rohctunnel
>> using these steps:https://rohc-lib.org/wiki/doku.php?id=rohc-tunnel
>>
>> I made the testes using ethernet and UDP rohctunnels. The same problem
>> appears in both cases.

> The rohctunnel app is deprecated. I used it for testing in the early
> days of the library. It was never intended for performances.

> The IP/ROHC tunnel application replaces it. Give it a try:
>   https://rohc-lib.org/wiki/doku.php?id=summary#ip_rohc_tunnel

> Also prefer using the ROHC library 1.7.0 over the 1.6.x versions.

> Regards,
> Didier

References