← Back to team overview

rohc team mailing list archive

Re: [Question #676790]: SID


Question #676790 on rohc changed:

    Status: Open => Answered

Didier Barvaux proposed the following answer:

The logic behind the DF, RND, NBO and SID fields is not defined well.
Currently packet type IR-DYN is forced if there are 3 or more "dynamic
fields" that changed. However, UO packets with Extension 3 can transmit
changes for TTL, TOS, DF, NBO, RND. Those changes are counted as 4
changed fields, so UO with EXT3 is not used while it could be. It might
save some bits. The logic behind dynamic fields should be reworked. I
tried to do that on the master branch. See https://github.com/didier-

Please give the updated master branch a try, and tell me how it behaves
for you.


You received this question notification because your team ROHC Team is
an answer contact for rohc.