scratch team mailing list archive

[Amos Blanton <amos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi All -

Derek and I talked a bit about this on another thread.
I removed the source for the pulse plugin because it doesn't really get
built as part of the packaging process (that would require us to have an
environment setup in which we could build the squeak-vm). Since we just
include the binary, I thought it would be best to remove it, because it
shouldn't be included as part of the Ubuntu source package. But it's not
easy to access that code from the svn now, so we'll probably add it back in.
We can add an exception so it doesn't get built into the source package for
Scratch - or else we can just remember to delete that folder before building
an official package for the ppa or multiverse.

On another note, if anyone knows any Ubuntu MOTUs, it would be great if you
could send them our way to take a look at the package on REVU -- Mako has
been having a little trouble with the REVU setup, and hasn't been able to
give it his support yet.

http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/scratch

-Amos



On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Derek O'Connell <doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi Amos,
>
> just curious about how things work re Assembla, it seems that it is
> being used to stores files that eventual end up in a package and *only*
> those files not *all* files associated with the project? What confuses
> me is if it is the former then where is the project site for the latter?
> After seeing your email this morning about removing PA source because it
> can not be included in the package (understandably) I checked Assembla
> and now anything I uploaded on Saturday has gone. It's probably my
> dummy-ness regarding packaging but I expected a project site to include
> all files and have a "debian" directory for files that will go into a
> package. Otherwise where would change history for code go? I would
> grateful if you could fill in the blanks for me.
>
> -D
>



-- 
_____
Amos