sts-sponsors team mailing list archive

1. sts-sponsors team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the sts-sponsors mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 1941988] Re: [SRU] Designate DNS – Secondary zone is failed to be created and gets into the ERROR status, (continued)
  • [Bug 1941988] Re: [SRU] Designate DNS – Secondary zone is failed to be created and gets into the ERROR status
    From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-09-14
• [Bug 1941988] [NEW] [SRU] Designate DNS – Secondary zone is failed to be created and gets into the ERROR status
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-07-27
• [Bug 1979933] Re: snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-07-25
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1979933] Re: snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-08-02
• [Bug 1979933] Re: snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-08-02
• [Bug 1979933] Re: snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-08-03
• [Bug 1979933] Re: snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-08-03
• [Bug 1979933] Re: snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-08-04
• [Bug 1979933] Re: snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-08-16
• [Bug 1979933] [NEW] snmptrapd Segmentation Faults When Calling my_load_defaults()
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-07-22
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2022-07-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2022-07-06
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2022-07-06
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Seyeong Kim, 2022-07-07
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Edward Hope-Morley, 2022-07-18
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Edward Hope-Morley, 2022-07-18
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Felipe Reyes, 2022-08-01
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-08-03
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2022-08-22
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Seyeong Kim, 2022-08-23
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Seyeong Kim, 2022-08-23
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Seyeong Kim, 2022-09-05
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-09-07
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-09-12
• [Bug 1980801] Re: Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Seyeong Kim, 2022-09-19
• [Bug 1980801] [NEW] Add missing options for 'server group list'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-07-06
• Please review and sponsor net-snmp for LP #1979933 for AT&T
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-07-04
• Re: Please review and sponsor net-snmp for LP #1979933 for AT&T
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-07-22
• Re: Please review and sponsor net-snmp for LP #1979933 for AT&T
  From: Mauricio Oliveira, 2022-07-22
• [Build #24107640] amd64 build of maas 1:3.2.0~rc2-11988-g.b8a83dd51-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in ubuntu focal RELEASE [~maas/ubuntu/3.2]
  From: Launchpad Buildd System, 2022-06-23
• [Bug 1979342] Re: ata_id command provides wrong information for ATA devices
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2022-06-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1979342] Re: ata_id command provides wrong information for ATA devices
  From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2022-06-21
• [Bug 1979342] Re: ata_id command provides wrong information for ATA devices
  From: Dan Streetman, 2022-06-22
• [Bug 1979342] Re: ata_id command provides wrong information for ATA devices
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-06-22
• [Bug 1979342] Re: ata_id command provides wrong information for ATA devices
  From: Martin Benicek, 2022-06-23
• [Bug 1979342] Re: ata_id command provides wrong information for ATA devices
  From: Dan Streetman, 2022-06-23
• [Bug 1979342] [NEW] ata_id command provides wrong information for ATA devices
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-06-21
• Please review and sponsor LP1968742 hwloc for Nvidia
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-06-16
• [Bug 1947099] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2022-06-09
• Invitation to sts-sponsors accepted by ddstreet
  From: Canonical Support Engineering MAAS support team, 2022-06-06
• [Bug 1954595] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2022-06-06
• nicolasbock extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-05-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• nicolasbock extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2023-05-07
• [Bug 1954595] Please test proposed package
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-05-25
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-20
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-05-25
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-05-25
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-25
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-25
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-25
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-05-25
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-26
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-05-26
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-05-26
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-05-26
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-05-26
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-27
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-27
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-05-28
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-30
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-30
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-06-06
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-06-06
• [Bug 1954595] Re: bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Zakhar, 2022-08-06
• [Bug 1954595] [NEW] bzr dh-make crash - no attribute 'initialize_on_transport'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-05-20
• ec2-hibinit-agent
  From: Dan Streetman, 2022-05-19
• Re: ec2-hibinit-agent
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-05-20
• Re: ec2-hibinit-agent
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2022-05-20
• [Bug 1940141] Autopkgtest regression report (openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.18)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2022-05-19
• [Bug 1947099] Please test proposed package
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-05-11
• [Bug 1940141] Autopkgtest regression report (openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.16)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2022-04-28
• [Bug 1940141] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2022-04-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1940141] Please test proposed package
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-05-18
• Please review and sponsor LP1968805 ec2-hibinit-agent for Amazon AWS
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-04-21
• Re: Please review and sponsor LP1968805 ec2-hibinit-agent for Amazon AWS
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-04-27
• Re: Please review and sponsor LP1968805 ec2-hibinit-agent for Amazon AWS
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-04-27
• Re: Please review and sponsor LP1968805 ec2-hibinit-agent for Amazon AWS
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-05-11
• Re: Please review and sponsor LP1968805 ec2-hibinit-agent for Amazon AWS
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-05-18
• Re: Please review and sponsor LP1968805 ec2-hibinit-agent for Amazon AWS
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2022-05-18
• [Bug 1872813] Re: cloud-init fails to detect iSCSI root on focal Oracle instances
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2022-04-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1872813] Re: cloud-init fails to detect iSCSI root on focal Oracle instances
  From: Jorge Merlino, 2022-04-19
• [Bug 1872813] [NEW] cloud-init fails to detect iSCSI root on focal Oracle instances
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-04-07
• [Bug 1965325] Re: upstream patch from opendev - double encoding-decoding
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2022-04-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1965325] Re: upstream patch from opendev - double encoding-decoding
  From: Heather Lemon, 2022-04-19
• [Bug 1965325] Re: upstream patch from opendev - double encoding-decoding
  From: Heather Lemon, 2022-04-19
• [Bug 1965325] [NEW] upstream patch from opendev - double encoding-decoding
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-04-05
• [Bug 1903776] Update Released
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1903776] Please test proposed package
  From: Brian Murray, 2022-03-22
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1903776] Please test proposed package
  From: Brian Murray, 2022-03-22
• [Bug 1903776] Please test proposed package
  From: Brian Murray, 2022-03-22
• jvosburgh extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-03-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• jvosburgh extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2023-02-21
• mfo extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-03-14
• freyes deactivated by freyes
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-03-14
• hopem extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-03-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• hopem extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2023-02-16
• dgadomski extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-03-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• dgadomski extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2023-02-20
• slashd deactivated by jvosburgh
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-03-10
• slashd extended their membership
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-03-10
• [Bug 1960863] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2022-03-07
• [Bug 1960863] Autopkgtest regression report (openssl/1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.11)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2022-02-23
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-02-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-02-16
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Seth Arnold, 2022-02-16
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-02-16
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-02-23
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-02-23
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-02-24
• [Bug 1960863] Re: armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-03-07
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-02-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2022-02-19
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Simon Poirier, 2022-02-23
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2022-03-11
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Andreas Hasenack, 2022-03-11
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-03-11
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Brian Murray, 2022-03-22
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Simon Poirier, 2022-03-28
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Simon Poirier, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Simon Poirier, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1903776] Re: Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1960863] [NEW] armv8 paca: poly1305 users see segfaults when pointer authentication in use on AWS Graviton 3 instances
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-02-15
• Please sponsor openssl for Focal for LP #1960863
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-02-14
• Re: Please sponsor openssl for Focal for LP #1960863
  From: Mauricio Oliveira, 2022-02-15
• Re: Please sponsor openssl for Focal for LP #1960863
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2022-02-28
• Re: Please sponsor openssl for Focal for LP #1960863
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2022-02-28
• Re: Please sponsor openssl for Focal for LP #1960863
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2022-03-01
• [Bug 1903776] [NEW] Changed ubuntu-keyring paths breaks upgrade to focal.
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-02-14
• [Bug 1915678] Update Released
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1915678] Update Released
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-02-02
• [Bug 1915678] Update Released
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-02-02
• [Bug 1915678] Update Released
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-02-02
• [Bug 1941745] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.2
  From: Edward Hope-Morley, 2022-01-27
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1941745] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.2
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-02-01
• [Bug 1941745] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.2
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2022-02-08
• slashd added by ddstreet
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-01-09
• slashd deactivated by cmisare
  From: Ubuntu Support Team, 2022-01-08
• [Bug 1955129] Re: trace-cmd report buffer overflow detected
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2021-12-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1955129] Re: trace-cmd report buffer overflow detected
  From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2021-12-17
• [Bug 1955129] Re: trace-cmd report buffer overflow detected
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2021-12-17
• [Bug 1955129] Re: trace-cmd report buffer overflow detected
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2021-12-19
• [Bug 1955129] Re: trace-cmd report buffer overflow detected
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2021-12-19
• [Bug 1955129] Re: trace-cmd report buffer overflow detected
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2023-03-01
• [Bug 1955129] [NEW] trace-cmd report buffer overflow detected
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2021-12-17
• [Bug 1941745] [NEW] [sru] sos upstream 4.2
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2021-12-09
• [Bug 1915678] Please test proposed package
  From: Corey Bryant, 2021-12-06
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1915678] Please test proposed package
  From: Brian Murray, 2021-12-07
• [Bug 1915678] Please test proposed package
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-01-13
• [Bug 1915678] Please test proposed package
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-01-18
• [Bug 1915678] Please test proposed package
  From: Corey Bryant, 2022-01-18
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Khaled El Mously, 2021-11-17
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-11-17
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-11-17
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-11-17
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-11-17
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Khaled El Mously, 2021-11-18
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Khaled El Mously, 2021-11-18
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-11-18
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Brian Murray, 2021-11-19
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2021-11-25
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Khaled El Mously, 2021-12-06
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2022-02-16
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2022-02-16
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-02-23
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-03-02
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-03-03
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2022-03-17
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Khaled El Mously, 2022-03-21
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Khaled El Mously, 2022-03-21
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-03-30
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-03-31
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-04-04
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-04-05
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-04-05
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-04-11
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-04-12
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-04-13
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-04-13
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-04-18
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-04-20
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-04-25
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-05-10
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-05-10
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Robie Basak, 2022-05-11
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-05-12
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-05-12
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Fabio Augusto Miranda Martins, 2022-05-12
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2022-06-09
• [Bug 1947099] Re: ipconfig does not honour user-requested timeouts in some cases
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2022-06-09
• [Bug 1771740] Update Released
  From: Brian Murray, 2021-11-17
• [Bug 1915678] Re: [SRU] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails
  From: Edward Hope-Morley, 2021-11-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1915678] Re: [SRU] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails
  From: Brett Milford, 2021-11-12
• [Bug 1915678] Re: [SRU] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails
  From: Brett Milford, 2021-11-12
• [Bug 1915678] Re: [SRU] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails
  From: Brett Milford, 2021-11-18
• [Bug 1915678] Re: [SRU] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails
  From: Brett Milford, 2021-11-30
• [Bug 1915678] Re: [SRU] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails
  From: Brett Milford, 2021-11-30
• [Bug 1915678] Re: [SRU] iSCSI+Multipath: Volume attachment hungs if sessiong scanning fails
  From: Brett Milford, 2021-11-30

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status