sts-sponsors team mailing list archive

1. sts-sponsors team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the sts-sponsors mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 1893513] Re: man page of lsof command broken, (continued)
  • [Bug 1893513] Re: man page of lsof command broken
    From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-06
  • [Bug 1893513] Re: man page of lsof command broken
    From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-06
• [Bug 1893513] [NEW] man page of lsof command broken
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-12-25
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2020-12-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-07
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2021-01-07
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Victor Tapia, 2021-01-12
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Victor Tapia, 2021-01-12
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Victor Tapia, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Victor Tapia, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Victor Tapia, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes ( RedHat Bug 1695343 )
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes ( RedHat Bug 1695343 )
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-20
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes ( RedHat Bug 1695343 )
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-20
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes ( RedHat Bug 1695343 )
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-20
• [Bug 1826737] Re: lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes ( RedHat Bug 1695343 )
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-20
• [Bug 1826737] [NEW] lshw does not list NVMe storage devices as "disk" nodes ( RedHat Bug 1695343 )
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-12-19
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-16
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-01-19
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-01-19
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-01-19
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-01-19
• Re: [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-19
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-19
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Robie Basak, 2021-01-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-21
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-21
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-21
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-24
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-24
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2021-01-24
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2021-01-24
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-25
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-26
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-08
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-08
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-08
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-08
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-09
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-02-09
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Brian Murray, 2021-02-09
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2021-02-10
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-10
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2021-02-11
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-02-11
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-17
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2021-02-18
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2021-02-18
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-18
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-02-20
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2021-02-22
• [Bug 1906720] Re: Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2021-02-22
• [Bug 1906720] [NEW] Fix the disable_ssl_certificate_validation option
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1900617] [NEW] gateway error detail is not passed along in raised exception
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-15
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-12-16
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-11
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-11
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-11
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-12
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-12
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-12
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-12
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-12
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Dan Streetman, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Heather Lemon, 2021-01-13
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1903733] Re: Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2021-01-14
• [Bug 1903733] [NEW] Out of memory issue for websocket client
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-12-15
• [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-08
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-08
• [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression
  From: Robie Basak, 2020-12-09
• [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression
  From: Robie Basak, 2020-12-09
• [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-10
• [Bug 1906627] Re: GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-10
• [Bug 1906627] [NEW] GSS-SPNEGO implementation in cyrus-sasl2 is incompatible with Active Directory, causing recent adcli regression
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-12-07
• Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-07
• Re: Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-08
• Re: Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-09
• Re: Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression
  From: Lukasz Zemczak, 2020-12-09
• Re: Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-10
• Re: Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression
  From: Lukasz Zemczak, 2021-01-07
• Re: Please review and consider sponsoring LP #1906627 for cyrus-sasl2, which fixes adcli regression
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2021-01-08
• Re: sssd/adcli regression after last upload
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-04
• Re: sssd/adcli regression after last upload
  From: Sergio Durigan Junior, 2020-12-04
• Re: sssd/adcli regression after last upload
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-05
• Re: sssd/adcli regression after last upload
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-12-07
• [Bug 1905579] Re: parted crashes with invalid pointer on resizepart
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-01
• [Bug 1905579] Please test proposed package
  From: Brian Murray, 2020-12-01
• [Bug 1905579] Re: parted crashes with invalid pointer on resizepart on focal
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-30
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1905579] Re: parted crashes with invalid pointer on resizepart on focal
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-11-30
• [Bug 1905579] Re: parted crashes with invalid pointer on resizepart on focal
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-01
• [Bug 1905579] Re: parted crashes with invalid pointer on resizepart on focal
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-12-01
• [Bug 1905579] Re: parted crashes with invalid pointer on resizepart on focal
  From: Brian Murray, 2020-12-01
• [Bug 1905579] [NEW] parted crashes with invalid pointer on resizepart on focal
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-11-30
• [Bug 1901555] [NEW] [plugin][networking] Include ns ip neigh and ip rule info
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-11-26
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-09
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-09
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-09
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-09
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-09
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-09
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-12
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-12
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-12
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-11-12
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-12
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Brian Murray, 2020-11-17
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-19
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-19
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-19
• [Bug 1868703] Re: Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-19
• [Bug 1868703] [NEW] Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-11-09
• Please review and potentially sponsor LP1868703 Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-09
• Re: Please review and potentially sponsor LP1868703 Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-09
• Re: Please review and potentially sponsor LP1868703 Support "ad_use_ldaps" flag for new AD requirements (ADV190023)
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1830746] Update Released
  From: Chris Halse Rogers, 2020-11-03
• [Bug 1830746] Autopkgtest regression report (systemd/237-3ubuntu10.43)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2020-10-27
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2020-10-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-10-21
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Hemanth Nakkina, 2020-10-22
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Hemanth Nakkina, 2020-11-08
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-10
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-12
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-23
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-11-24
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-26
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-26
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-11-26
• [Bug 1898077] Re: [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-11-28
• [Bug 1898077] [NEW] [conntrackd][plugin] add conntrack info
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-10-21
• [Bug 1820929] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-10-06
• [Bug 1852747] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1879987] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1895757] Re: Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2020-09-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1895757] Re: Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-30
• [Bug 1895757] Re: Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-30
• [Bug 1895757] [NEW] Terminal hangs running sudo when "use_pty" is set in /etc/sudoers
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-09-23
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-23
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-23
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-09-23
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] Re: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-09-24
• [Bug 1852747] [NEW] mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-09-23
• [Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-09-21
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-10-26
• [Bug 1830746] Re: memlock setting in systemd (pid 1) too low for containers (bionic)
  From: Guilherme G. Piccoli, 2020-11-01

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status