sts-sponsors team mailing list archive

1. sts-sponsors team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the sts-sponsors mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 1885562] Re: [fips] freebl_fipsSoftwareIntegrityTest fails in FIPS mode, (continued)
  • [Bug 1885562] Re: [fips] freebl_fipsSoftwareIntegrityTest fails in FIPS mode
    From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-08-10
  • [Bug 1885562] Re: [fips] freebl_fipsSoftwareIntegrityTest fails in FIPS mode
    From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-08-10
• [Bug 1885562] [NEW] [fips] freebl_fipsSoftwareIntegrityTest fails in FIPS mode
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-15
• [Bug 1873368] Re: ssshuttle server fails to connect endpoints with python 3.8
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-07-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1873368] Re: ssshuttle server fails to connect endpoints with python 3.8
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-07-14
• [Bug 1873368] [NEW] ssshuttle server fails to connect endpoints with python 3.8
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-14
• [Bug 1861177] Autopkgtest regression report (libseccomp/2.4.3-1ubuntu3.18.04.3)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2020-07-14
• [Bug 1861177] Autopkgtest regression report (libseccomp/2.4.3-1ubuntu3.19.10.3)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2020-07-13
• [Bug 1861177] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-07-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1861177] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-07-13
• [Bug 1874075] Update Released
  From: Brian Murray, 2020-07-07
• [Bug 1874075] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-07-06
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-06-30
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2020-07-06
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-07-09
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-07-13
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-07-13
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-14
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2020-07-16
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2020-07-16
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2020-07-17
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2020-07-20
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Ioanna Alifieraki, 2020-07-20
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-23
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-23
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-23
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-23
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-23
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-07-23
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2020-07-27
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2020-08-02
• [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-08-18
• [Bug 1861177] [NEW] seccomp_rule_add is very slow
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-29
• [Bug 1869465] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-06-22
• [Bug 1871214] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-06-18
• [Bug 1869465] Autopkgtest regression report (makedumpfile/1:1.6.5-1ubuntu1~18.04.5)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2020-06-15
• [Bug 1869465] Autopkgtest regression report (makedumpfile/1:1.6.6-2ubuntu2.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2020-06-15
• [Bug 1869465] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-06-15
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1869465] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-06-15
• [Bug 1869465] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-06-15
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-04
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2020-06-04
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-05
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-08
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-08
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-08
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-08
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot, 2020-06-08
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-08
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2020-06-09
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-09
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-06-15
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: chenrongwen, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Guilherme G. Piccoli, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Guilherme G. Piccoli, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-17
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-17
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-17
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-17
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-06-17
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-22
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-22
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-22
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-22
• [Bug 1869465] Re: Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira, 2020-09-22
• [Bug 1869465] [NEW] Kdump-Tools: Makedumpfile Failed, Falling Back To 'Cp'
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-04
• [Bug 1876600] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-05-25
• [Bug 1876230] Update Released
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-05-25
• [Bug 1867676] Update Released
  From: Brian Murray, 2020-05-19
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1867676] Update Released
  From: Corey Bryant, 2020-07-06
• [Bug 1867676] Please test proposed package
  From: Corey Bryant, 2020-05-18
• [Bug 1876600] Autopkgtest regression report (systemd/237-3ubuntu10.41)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2020-05-15
• [Bug 1876230] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-05-15
• [Bug 1876600] Re: cookie overruns can cause org.freedesktop.systemd1 dbus to hang
  From: Brian Murray, 2020-05-14
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1876600] Re: cookie overruns can cause org.freedesktop.systemd1 dbus to hang
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2020-05-22
• [Bug 1876600] Re: cookie overruns can cause org.freedesktop.systemd1 dbus to hang
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-05-25
• [Bug 1876600] Re: cookie overruns can cause org.freedesktop.systemd1 dbus to hang
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-09-04
• [Bug 1876600] Re: cookie overruns can cause org.freedesktop.systemd1 dbus to hang
  From: Heitor Alves de Siqueira, 2020-09-09
• [Bug 1876600] Re: cookie overruns can cause org.freedesktop.systemd1 dbus to hang
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-09-15
• [Bug 1874075] Autopkgtest regression report (rabbitmq-server/3.8.2-0ubuntu1.1)
  From: Ubuntu SRU Bot, 2020-05-14
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Upgrade rabbitmq-server to v3.8.3 from upstream
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-13
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Upgrade rabbitmq-server to v3.8.3 from upstream
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-13
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Upgrade rabbitmq-server to v3.8.3 from upstream
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-13
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Upgrade rabbitmq-server to v3.8.3 from upstream
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-05-14
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Update debian/watch file to download from GitHub
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-05-12
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Update debian/watch file to download from GitHub
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-05-12
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Update debian/watch file to download from GitHub
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-05-12
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Update debian/watch file to download from GitHub
  From: Lucas Kanashiro, 2020-05-12
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Update debian/watch file to download from GitHub
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-05-12
• [Bug 1878049] Re: Update debian/watch file to download from GitHub
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-05-12
• [Bug 1878049] [NEW] Update debian/watch file to download from GitHub
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-05-12
• [Bug 1876600] [NEW] cookie overruns can cause org.freedesktop.systemd1 dbus to hang
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-05-06
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-05
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-05
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-05
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-05-06
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-05-06
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-06
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Rafael David Tinoco, 2020-05-08
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-11
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Matthew Ruffell, 2020-05-12
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-05-14
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Rafael David Tinoco, 2020-05-14
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-05-15
• [Bug 1876230] Re: liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-05-25
• [Bug 1876230] [NEW] liburcu: Enable MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED to address performance problems with MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-05-05
• [Bug 1865212] Please test proposed package
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Rodrigo Barbieri, 2020-04-29
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Rodrigo Barbieri, 2020-04-29
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2020-05-13
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Dariusz Gadomski, 2020-05-14
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-05-28
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-05-29
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Timo Aaltonen, 2020-06-10
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Robie Basak, 2020-06-10
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Rodrigo Barbieri, 2020-06-10
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Rodrigo Barbieri, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Rodrigo Barbieri, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Rodrigo Barbieri, 2020-06-16
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Robie Basak, 2020-06-17
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-06-18
• [Bug 1871214] Re: [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Rodrigo Barbieri, 2020-06-28
• [Bug 1871214] [NEW] [SRU] nfsd doesn't start if exports depend on mount
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-04-29
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Lucas Kanashiro, 2020-04-27
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Trent Lloyd, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Mathew Hodson, 2020-05-02
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Chris Halse Rogers, 2020-05-06
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Lothar Braun, 2020-05-06
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Luis Alberto Pabón, 2020-05-07
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Lothar Braun, 2020-05-07
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Luis Alberto Pabón, 2020-05-07
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Luis Alberto Pabón, 2020-05-07
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Luis Alberto Pabón, 2020-05-07
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Jeff Abrahamson, 2020-06-13
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Kiruahxh, 2020-06-15
• [Bug 1871685] Re: [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-06-19
• [Bug 1871685] [NEW] [SRU] vagrant spits out ruby deprecation warnings on every call
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-04-25
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-28
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-04-28
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-04-28
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-04-28
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1865212] Re: simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-24
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-04-28
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-29
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-29
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1874526] Re: [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1865212] [NEW] simple.sh to be run as part of the autopkgtests
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-04-24
• [Bug 1874526] [NEW] [landscape] Substitute oidc conf in service file
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-04-24
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Heather Lemon, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-04-28
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Łukasz Zemczak, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871494] Re: add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-30
• [Bug 1871494] [NEW] add lshw cmd into sosreport's hardware plugin
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-23
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-23
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Eric Desrochers, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Dan Streetman, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-27
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-29
• [Bug 1874075] Re: rabbitmq-server startup timeouts differ between SysV and systemd
  From: Nicolas Bock, 2020-04-29

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status