← Back to team overview

syncany-team team mailing list archive

Re: [Question #212148]: non-encrypted storage also supported?

 

Question #212148 on Syncany changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/syncany/+question/212148

    Status: Open => Answered

John David Chibuk proposed the following answer:
You are correct. As I was in search for the bidirectional system however
the development so far is of the later.

John David Chibuk
Telephone: +16478956107
On Oct 23, 2012 6:56 PM, "Eric Levy" <question212148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> New question #212148 on Syncany:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/syncany/+question/212148
>
> Hello,
>
> I am a developer who found this project after searching in frustration for
> an open-source solution to bidirectional file synchronization over a
> network.
>
> I reviewed the main web site and casually browsed the trunk.
>
> Before anything else, I have to understand something:  It appears from the
> literature and the code that the entire design of the project revolves
> around the idea of combining the concepts of revision management and
> encryption under the same umbrella.  In this understanding, the project
> does *not* aim at all to perform bidirectional file synchronization, a
> scheme where two repositories would be kept synchronized as independently
> usable file trees.
>
> Did I get this correct?
>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> Syncany Team, which is an answer contact for Syncany.
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~syncany-team
> Post to     : syncany-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~syncany-team
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
Syncany Team, which is an answer contact for Syncany.