torios-dev team mailing list archive

[KI7MT <ki7mt@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello All

Not sure if this is applicable, but, apt-cache rdepends lsb-release
returns a pretty hefty list for r-deps on a standard install, but I'm
not sure how that applies, if at all, to your OBI.

If LSB release is not installed: cat /etc/issue  will yield the basic
info, like:

Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS \n \l

best regards,

Greg.


On 05/18/2015 11:02 PM, Israel wrote:
> On 05/18/2015 11:49 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>> Den 2015-05-18 23:35, Israel skrev:
>>> Hi Nio
>>> (inlines)
>>>
>>> On 05/18/2015 01:59 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>>>> Hi Israel,
>>>>
>>>> I installed and tested the OBI-installer in the installed system
>>>> (installed from the tarball that comes with the ToriOS iso file).
>>>>
>>>> I found two bugs (that do not affect the live system).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. starter
>>>>
>>>> When there is no /tarballs directory and ~/tarballs link, the
>>>> complicated logic in 'starter' prevents taking care of the result from
>>>> 'select tarball'. This might be an old bug. I uploaded a new version,
>>>> where it is fixed.
>>> hmmm... thanks for finding/fixing this!
>>>> 2. dltbl
>>>>
>>>> dltbl is affected by your making ToriOS an own distro and changing the
>>>> output of the following command:
>>>>
>>>> cat /etc/*release
>>>>
>>>> I uploaded a new version, where this bug is fixed.
>>> Ah... there might be more bugs from this too...  I think maybe I should
>>> revert this change, do you?
>>>> You can find the uploaded script files at Phill's server
>>>>
>>>> http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/torios/2015-05/
>>>>
>>>> I have tested them, but I think that at least one more person should
>>>> test that they still work as they should in the live system.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Nio
>>>
>> Hi Israel,
>>
>> I don't think I use the 'cat /etc/*release' information elsewhere. I'm
>> not too worried about that for the OBI.
>>
>> Are you using that information somewhere?
>>
>> Can we expect there to be problems with apt-get and version management?
>> I don't know. I have not seen any such problem yet.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Nio
> Hi Nio,
> no problems with apt-get, as that relies on the sources.list
> There may be a problem somewhere... but I do not know...  I am not sure
> what all looks at lsb_release
> 
> This is something to look at, and keep in mind :)
>