touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #79539
[Bug 1457321] [NEW] lxc-stop does not shut down container
Public bug reported:
lxc-stop sends SIGPWR to a container's pid 1 to notify it that it should
shut down. This merely starts sigpwr.target right now, but nothing is
hooked into it. That's deliberate for "real iron" systems as there it's
usually UPSes sending that, which should be handled by e. g. nut, not
directly systemd. However, for containers I believe that's a safe
default.
https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-
users/2015-May/009279.html
SRU TEST CASE:
--------------
- Create a vivid LXC container (system or unprivileged)
- Try to lxc-stop it. With current vivid it will do nothing/hang, with the proposed version it will shut down as expected.
REGRESSION POTENTIAL:
---------------------
- This new unit is only active in containers (LXC, docker, nspawn, etc.). There a possible regression is that someone is running/testing nut or a similar UPS responder in a container, but that seems like a theoretical scenario only.
- There is no change for VMs or "real" hardware.
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu Vivid)
Importance: Medium
Status: New
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: systemd-boot
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Vivid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: systemd-boot
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Vivid)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Description changed:
lxc-stop sends SIGPWR to a container's pid 1 to notify it that it should
shut down. This merely starts sigpwr.target right now, but nothing is
hooked into it. That's deliberate for "real iron" systems as there it's
usually UPSes sending that, which should be handled by e. g. nut, not
directly systemd. However, for containers I believe that's a safe
default.
https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-
users/2015-May/009279.html
+
+ SRU TEST CASE:
+ --------------
+ - Create a vivid LXC container (system or unprivileged)
+ - Try to lxc-stop it. With current vivid it will do nothing/hang, with the proposed version it will shut down as expected.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Wily)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1457321
Title:
lxc-stop does not shut down container
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in systemd source package in Vivid:
New
Status in systemd source package in Wily:
In Progress
Bug description:
lxc-stop sends SIGPWR to a container's pid 1 to notify it that it
should shut down. This merely starts sigpwr.target right now, but
nothing is hooked into it. That's deliberate for "real iron" systems
as there it's usually UPSes sending that, which should be handled by
e. g. nut, not directly systemd. However, for containers I believe
that's a safe default.
https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-
users/2015-May/009279.html
SRU TEST CASE:
--------------
- Create a vivid LXC container (system or unprivileged)
- Try to lxc-stop it. With current vivid it will do nothing/hang, with the proposed version it will shut down as expected.
REGRESSION POTENTIAL:
---------------------
- This new unit is only active in containers (LXC, docker, nspawn, etc.). There a possible regression is that someone is running/testing nut or a similar UPS responder in a container, but that seems like a theoretical scenario only.
- There is no change for VMs or "real" hardware.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1457321/+subscriptions
Follow ups
References